Rossi Blog Reader
This website tracks recent postings to Andrea Rossi's
Journal of Nuclear Physics,
sorting the entries with priority to Rossi's answers, which appear under each question.
• Email to Andrea Rossi - Journal Of Nuclear Physics
• Website comments to the Webmaster (who has no contact or connection with Rossi).
• Updated: 2024-09-20 07:50:10.910043Z
Where can I find an introduction to the Vacuum related to the Ecat technology ?
Thank you if you can answer,
Silvano
Silvano:
You can find the bases in the paragraph 4 of
http://www.researchgate.net/publication/330601653_E-Cat_SK_and_long_range_particle_interactions
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Dr. Rossi,
maybe you want to see the future of farming. Made possible with your invention.
It is the third of its kind that has been built in the last five years in this country. Of course, this country values self-sufficiency and is willing to pay for the well-being of its citizens. But with your ecat and the cheap energy, this will probably become the rule everywhere.
https://odysee.com/@DPRK-Media:8/The-greenhouse-farm-Kangdong:5
Best regards
Ben G.
Ben G.:
Thank you for your insight and for the link,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Dr Rossi,
having spent a large part of your life working on this technology, and being very close to it, you maybe unable to see the wood for the trees, as an old aphorism goes.
The Ecat technology is a development of historical importance, and incredible magnitude.
It would be too much to say familiarity breed contempt, but it is likely you do not fully appreciate the priceless value of your achievement.
The world will soon be aware, God willing, and rightly grateful.
David, UK
David:
Thank you for your moving comment and for your respect for the work of our Team; I promise we will take care not to fall in a “familiarity breed contempt” ( he,he,he: nice way to put the point )
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Andrea Rossi,
Another eCat application…
Consider a transatlantic subsea pipeline(s) for oil and/or natural gas from the US to Europe? Deep water unmanned pumping stations powered by eCat technology working 24/7 would pump the product. No more transporting by ship.
With a properly designed and implemented system, it would run continuously for decades.
Thoughts?
Steven Nicholes Karels:
Thank you for the suggestion, but: I am receiving from our Readers many suggestions to go subsea, in the sky, in the space, underground… so far my mind is humbly thinking to deliver on the ground.
Nonetheless, the suggestions are always inspiring, longshot or fantascientific as they might be !
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Readers:
Please go to
http://www.rossilivecat.com
to find comments published in other posts of this blog,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dr Rossi,
I think that the most important reference to understand the theoretical structure of the Ecat is the #49 cited in the References of the paper
http://www.researchgate.net/publication/330601653_E-Cat_SK_and_long_range_particle_interactions
Best
Giuseppe Maiorana
Giuseppe Maiorana:
I would add the patent of L.Nelson reported in paragraph 2.1 of the paper you cited and its References # 1, 16, 17, 27, 32 in first place; all the reported References of that paper are useful, though.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
When will you publish the date and location of the EV demo ?
Anonymous:
Within the first week of October,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Dr Rossi
Please be aware that Tesla will be holding their Robotaxi announcement event on Oct 10. This will be a long awaited major event and you probably would not your own long awaited major event to compete on the same day with it.
Regards
Charles Jameson
Charles Jameson:
Thank you for the information,
Warm Regards,
Andrea Rossi
Dear Andrea,
How many people does your team consist of?
Albo70:
21
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Andrea Rossi,
A few questions on the preparation for the upcoming EV test:
1. Is everything on schedule for your first closed doors test with in the first 10 day s of October?
2. Are you already performing initial runs with the EV to characterize the performance?
3. Will you also be recording (video, data and otherwise) the closed door test for your own records? This could be useful comparison data for evaluating the performance of the public run.
Anyway good luck and I hope all goes well with you and your team in these last few weeks of preparation.
Thanks and Best Regards
Stephen
Stephen:
1. yes
2. yes
3. yes
Thank you for your kind wishes from all of our Team,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Andrea Rossi,
The use of eCat technology to allow continuous travel at high speeds does not make economic sense. Assuming an energy efficiency of 0.3kW-hr/mile and a sustained speed of 80 mph, we compute a minimum required eCat output of 24 kW.
At a cost of $2.50USD/Watt the cost for eCat components would be $60,000 USD.
Most people drive less than 20 miles per day. Assuming a quadrupling of that range for daily charging means that daily charging will require 80 miles * 0.30 kW-hrs/mile = 24 kW-hrs.
A 1 or 2 kW eCat operating while the car is parked will provide sufficient charge for daily travel. In this case, the eCat costs will range between $2,500 AND $5,000 USD.
Longer travel can use charging stations. This will less if the EV can accept a lower charging rate. This is applicable where residential charging is not available.
Assuming a 1kW eCat is sufficient and the mobile charging system could be produced for $3,000 USD, and a grid electric cost of $0.20 USD / kW-hr, the added mobile charger would pay for itself in 15,000 kW-hrs. At an assumed daily energy use of 24 kW-hrs, the system would pay for itself in under 2 years.
Thoughts?
Steven Nicholes Karels:
Thank you for your insight,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Andrea,
Wouldn’t it be best if battery manufacturers integrated the E-Cat in such a way that the car’s battery management system does not see the E-Cat?
Best Regards
Wilfried
Wilfried:
Thank you for your insight,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dr Rossi,
With an E-Cat powered E.V , why not split the battery in half? One will power the E.V. while the other will be charging by the E-Cat. When the powering battery runs low on charge a switching system reverses the two batteries. The E.V. electrical system never “sees” the E-Cat. The E.V. electronics will only “see” a battery that it’s designed to operate with.
Ron:
Thank you for your suggestion,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Andrea,
Your website states that the operational lifetime of an E-Cat NGU unit is 100,000 hours.
What would happen at the end of that lifetime?
a) The unit would stop working?
b) The unit would work, but at a lower efficiency?
c) You don’t know yet, because you haven’t run one for that length of time?
Many thanks,
Frank Acland
Frank Acland:
c
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Will the 2 EV run at the same speed for all the 6 hours of the race ?
Anonymous:
Yes,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Andrea,
I suspect that Nicola Tesla wanted to form a plasma inside the dome with his tower and control it with copper plates that were never mounted.
In this respect, Tesla’s design has similarities with the plasma chamber of the E-Cat.
Could it be that Tesla and you were working on the same theory?
https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wardenclyffe_Tower#/media/Datei:Tesla_Broadcast_Tower_1904.jpeg
Best Regards
Wilfried
Translated with DeepL.com (free version)
Wilfried:
Maybe,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Raffaele Bongo
It would be spectacular if there were constant sparks and lightning around the car with the E-Cat during the EV demonstration.
When we returned from vacation with our family, we were already able to enjoy such a spectacle: https://photos.app.goo.gl/MK8YvRqjAwhuhnop8
The plane and the electronics in it did not break down. Hopefully there will be no dense fog during the demonstration.
Best regards,
Koen
Hello DR Rossi
Nikola Tesla fact or fiction.
https://youtu.be/s7hKlL8QiUo?si=brNmPP_6sb00sl6x
Regards
Sam
Sam:
Thank you for the link,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Hello Dr. Rossi
You have solved grounding with “proportional ground”.
Can you explain in a few simple words its design and how it works?
Thank you if you can give me a simple explanation.
Kind regards
Raffaele
Raffaele Bongo:
Please go to
https://www.maltep.com/en/content/43-the-electrical-mass
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Dr. Rossi,
Which kind of device will you use for the heater demonstration ?
Warm regards
Frank
Anonymous:
A resistive load,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Dr. Rossi,
will the test/demonstration with ecat and electric heater be published before or after the EV-test?
Because i drive just 2-3000km/a the demonstration with the electric heater is much more interesting for me. The most energy i need in a year is for heating.
Warm regards
Frank
Frank:
It will be done eventually, after the EV test,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Hello Dr. Rossi
Can you tell us how fast the cars will go during the demonstration?
A – equal to or greater than 80 Mph to force the control car to stop for lack of electricity more quickly.
B – equal to or less than 50 Mph to be able to complete the demonstration with the E-Cat car 100% charged
Kind regards
Raffaele
Raffaele Bongo:
We’ll disclose information the day of the streaming,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Todd Buckett:
1- no
2- yes
3- it depends on the power
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Will you have a security assistance during the Ecat powered EV demonstration ?
Anonymous:
Yes,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Have your have you tested your devices in a vacuum?
Will they function if isolated from any ground if they have an interior grounding mass? And what is the approximate mass needed to make one of the devices function?
You are leaving your believers standing in the rain not answering how much time will be necessary for us to buy an Ecat.
Dieter Zoeller
Dieter Zoeller:
1- we will communicate the date few days before the event, for security reasons,
2- see 1
3- for security reasons the attendance will be very restricted, but the event will be totally streamed allowing a complete and exhaustive view.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Hello Mr. Rossi,
Has a location and date for the test drive in October already been set?
If not, when will the date be announced and where will it be published?
Is it still possible to apply to take part, and if so, what is the deadline for the selection process?
VG
Dieter Zöller
Dr Joseph Fine:
Thank you for your insight; anyway, we will not disclose the model we will show until the day of the demo, so I cannot confirm or deny which model we will use.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Andrea Rossi and Readers:
I was curious about learning more about the Taycan, which I assume is the type of vehicle(s) being considered for this year’s demonstration – a ‘race’ that hopefully, everyone can ‘win’! Here is a link describing more about the Taycan.
https://newsroom.porsche.com/en/2024/products/porsche-the-new-taycan-35190.html
https://topelectricsuv.com/news/porsche/2024-porsche-taycan-changes/
https://www.wired.com/story/electric-car-two-speed-transmission-gearbox/
I found these articles to be interesting, and hope they do not distract from the original purpose of the October demonstration.
Please drive carefully. And, even though this car could run for years, take your rest stops.
Pleasant journeys,
Joseph Fine
Sometimes a lost gem shows up on internet:
https://anoncyberarmy.wordpress.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/free-energy-principles.pdf
Best Wishes, Hermes
Hermes Atar Trismegistus:
Thank you for the link,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Andrea Rossi,
Martian Power
“To effectively run a habitat on Mars and create fuel, about 40 kW would be needed, so NASA would likely send four to five of the (10 kW) reactors to the planet’s surface.”
Perhaps something you should keep in mind. Building a small, 10kW output unit using 4 or 5 3KW NGU devices, with some of the 12kW to 15kw used for environmental control and internal control, theoretically, should be trivial.
Whether on Mars, or beyond, solar power will not work because the solar illumination level is too low and the transportation cost is too high. A power source with nuclear energy density is needed.
The Spacex Starship will transport 100 tons (or more) to Mars. How many 3 kW NGU units could be transported within the 100-ton payload limit?
Thoughts?
Steven Nicholes Karels:
I do not have information about this kind of application, that so far is out of our range.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Dr. Rossi
I increased my pre-order to 1 Kw.
That should be enough for my future Camper, if it’s not enough you won’t run away… right?
Gavino Mamia,
Right,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Will there also be representatives / team members of the EV Producer at the demo?
Energy User:
Possibly,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Andrea Rossi.
“October 19 (2023) marks the last day of operations for Norway’s only coal power plant. Providing heat and electricity to Longyearbyen since 1983, the plant was also the world’s northernmost, at 78° North.
The plant produced 11 MW electricity and 20 MW thermal heat. CO2 emissions will be halved from today’s 70,00o tons annually with the transfer from coal to diesel. The cut equals emissions from about 20,000 cars.
Locals are invited to the plant to mark the official shutdown. “This marks the end of a chapter in our history,” Svalbard Energy writes in the invitation.
Environmentalists have long criticized Norway for mining coal and running a coal power plant at Svalbard as the Arctic is warming in times of climate crisis.
Coal means more to Longyearbyen than just being a source of local energy. The town was established, and named after, John Munro Longyear, whose Arctic Coal Company started mining there in 1906. The Norwegians took over the mining in 1916 and coal was the cornerstone of Norway’s activities at Svalbard until the 1990s when tourism and science started to grow.”
Could not eCat technology be employed here? Generating 33 MW of electricity – 11 MW for electrical needs, and 22 MW for heating, should easily be within your capabilities.
Thoughts?
Steven Nicholes Karels:
Theoretically yes,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Will the streaming cover the whole 6 hours of the race between the 2 EV, of which one powered by the Ecat ?
Anonymous:
Yes; 6 screens will show all the points of the circit for the whole 6 hours, without interruptions.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Hello Dr. Rossi
Can you tell us what type of current you use to charge the car battery?
A – Alternating current via the charger.
B – Direct current.
C – Sorry this information is confidential at the moment.
All my support to the whole team and good luck
Kind regards
Raffaele
Raffaele Bongo:
DC
Thank you for your support,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Andrea!
Will you show the other two demo, even if one demo fail in october?
Good Luck!
Best regards
Nils Fryklund
Nils Fryklund:
I am not able to answer,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Andrea, I remember speaking with you about the need for an earth connection for the system to function and I now understand that the problem has been solved with a “proportional mass”. I congratulate you for your solution and I wonder then if in the case of applications furniture, can electrical conduction with water be sufficient for a boat (the hull if it is metal or a small immersed chain if it is plastic) or sliding contact with conductive rubber as was used many years ago to discharge electrostatic charges in cars?
Neri Accornero:
Thank you for your suggestion,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
In ‘2024-09-02 13:27’ Zimmermann writes :-
‘I would not like it to pay 30,000 Euro for integral ecat and cannot use it at home.’
The solution that Zimmermann suggests is ‘… if it is loaded you can carry the ecat into the house and use it there’. The better solution is VtoH or VtoG as described in https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vehicle-to-grid. Such portable ecats in a car or in a house would be insecure and vulnerable to theft. There is an insurance aspect as well.
https://www.cars.com/articles/whats-bidirectional-charging-and-which-evs-offer-it-457608/
Paul Dodgshun:
Thank you for the links,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Andrea Rossi,
An agricultural tractor comes in several power variants – from 25hp to 85hp *roughly 20kW to 70kW).
During certain times of the year, they are used for long hours per day, but mostly are unused during the reminder of the year.
How about an electric farm tractor with a removable eCat power suitcase. During the busy times, the suitcase powers the tractor. The other times, the suitcase powers the farmer’s house and other fixed needs. During the “busy” times, the farmer relies on grid power to supplement his electrical needs.
In summary – electric tractor will last longer, decrease the farm’s annual grid electrical consumption, with possible sell-back of excess power to the Grid.
Steven Nicholes Karels:
Thank you for your suggestion,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dr. Rossi,
With respect to portable applications of the Ecat and “proportional mass”– to better understand its application-
If I wanted to utilize a 1kW Ecat in a portable power station application for hiking and camping, is it your current thinking that:
1) The proportional mass could be built into the 1kW Ecat device?
2) The proportional mass could be built into the power station assembly that incorporates the 1kW Ecat device?
3) No proportional mass would be needed and the end-user would be required to pound a conductive rod into the earth to provide an earth-ground for the 1kW portable power station?
Thanks, WaltC
WaltC:
1- it is already built in by us
2- see 1
3- no: this would be necessary in more industrial applications
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Understood
If the Ecat needs, as you said here, an earthly connection, how can this be coherent with a mobile application?
Anonymous:
For mobile applications we use a mass proportional to the power connected with the circuit,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Andrea,
When you do the EV demonstration, will you weigh each EV prior to, and after the race?
Thank you,
Frank Acland
Frank Acland:
Yes,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dr Rossi,
should it be possible to order you presently a 1 MW Ecat ?
Thank you if you can answer
Anonymous:
Yes
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Hello Mr. Rossi,
the most easy way for car producers would be a charge plug inside of the trunk. Everytime you pause at the Autobahn or in a carport at home you can load the car with the ecat in the trunk. And if it is loaded you can carry the ecat into the house and use it there. I would not like it to pay 30,000 Euro for integral ecat and cannot use it at home.
And people who do not drive much can use a petrol car and refuel with synthetic fuel, made with the ecat and Co2.
Best regards
Zimmermann
Zimmermann:
Thank you for your suggestion,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
@Martin
With 10 kW, frequent drivers would have an infinite range. But it’s true that 8 hours of driving per day with a 2-hour charging break in between would be sufficient for dimentionalization.
I’m also thinking of vacation trips through Europe.
If a BEV can already drive slowly with 2 kW, 2 kW would probably also be sufficient. If necessary, you could still drive to the next fast charging station.
Best Regards
Wilfried
Dr Rossi,
Does have analogies with the actual Ecat SKLep NGU the experimental test described in paragraph 6 of
http://www.researchgate.net/publication/330601653_E-Cat_SK_and_long_range_particle_interactions
?
Anonymous:
The core of the reactor is still the same, as well as the theoretical principle
Warm Regards,
A.R.
@Wilfried
Why is so much attention paid to an EV with 10 kW Ecat??
In my opinion, this is very expensive and not at all profitable.
Example:
– 20000 km./year
– Consumption : 14 kW./100 km. = 2800 kWh/year.
– Cost 2800 kWh at 0.39$ = 1092$
– Cost Ecat 10 kW = 24900$
If you pay 24900$ to save 1092$/year, then you have to drive that Ecat for 22.8 years to save 0$ !
An EV and its battery don’t last that long!
The cost of 24900$ is already more than 50% of the cost of the EV !
Who is going to actually pay for the extra cost of 10 kW Ecat?
A much better solution is, for example, to connect 1 kW Ecat to a (micro) inverter on the grid.
Cost 2490$
Yield : 24 kWh/day – 8760 kWh/year.
Together with your PV installation (if you already have one) >95% of your consumption will be free !
Mr Raffaele Bongo,
Yes, I took the example of our first EV. It was easier to calculate with 1.5 kWh/10km. In fact the car takes a little bit more. We have another EV which consumes about 2.0 kWh/10km
You wrote: “consumes 14 kWh at 90 km/h (56 Mph), 18 kWh at 100 km/h (62 Mph) and 25 kWh at 130 km/h (81 Mph) in normal conditions” That is not correct you also must add distance, like “kWh/10km” Or just the power in kW:s!
Regards
Probably for to couple the Ecat with the EV electric engine you need a complex system of capacities, correct ?
Ben
Benjamin:
Yes, with very particular characteristics we had to invent
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Hello Mr. Mats Heijkenskjold
Your car really looks very economical in terms of electrical energy. My car, which is four years old, consumes 14 kWh at 90 km/h (56 Mph), 18 kWh at 100 km/h (62 Mph) and 25 kWh at 130 km/h (81 Mph) in normal conditions (weather, luggage,…)
For total autonomy you would need a generator with a minimum power of 33 Kw.
Kind regards
Raffaele
Wilfried,
There are several levels of complexity is charging EV.
The most demanding level is charging while the EV is in motion. One must handle regenerative braking, EV battery system monitoring, and course EV battery system charging. Variables include speed, road inclination, load, and temperature. It is a difficult problem.
A much lower level (easier) situation is charging while the EV is parked. Then the options are direct battery system charging (faster) or use the onboard charger (slower).
Dear Andrea,
You replied to Raffaele that “this is not possible”.
I can’t understand that at all. Do you think that the car manufacturers are not prepared to develop such a setup or do you see fundamental problems? Let’s leave aside the volume of the E-Cats. 10 KW E-CATs could certainly be packed into the trunk of a suitable car. Including recuperation, this should be sufficient for continuous urban traffic to be able to drive 24/7 and even charge the battery. My point is not that the adaptation electronics still need to be developed, because that would just be hard work and not research.
Best Regards
Wilfried
Wilfried:
You do not know the interfacing system and the connected issues, about which we cannot disclose information. I answer “it’s impossible” because it actually is. So far.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Raffaele Bongo:
Good dream!
If I drive my EV which takes 1.5 kWh/10km at a speed of 90 kph. In 6.7 minutes I have driven 10 km. That means you consume 60/6.7 x 1.5 kWh in 1.0 hour = 9.0 kWh. The power to drive the car is then 9 kW!
E-cat of 3 kW is not enough! You need 6 kW more from the battery!
Regards
Hello Dr. Rossi
If it is obvious to charge the control car to 100%, it is in my opinion: less obvious to charge the vehicle equipped with the E-Cat generator identically.
By providing higher energy of a few kW/h more than the average consumption of the car, the E-Cat will charge the battery throughout the demonstration.
Assuming that you leave with half the charge of a 60 Kwh battery and that the E-Cat provides 3 kWh more than the vehicle’s consumption, after 6 hours your car will end up 80% charged.
For me, it goes beyond the dream to start at 50% and finish at 80%, it goes beyond the dream…
All my best wishes for success in this beautiful demonstration.
Kind regards
Raffaele Bongo
Raffaele Bongo:
Thank you for your suggestion,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Thank you for your suggestion, I am not an expert of this and will pass it to the specialist that is taking care of the streaming.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Andrea Rossi,
If possible, I would recommend public telemetry systems, completely sperate from your internal usage.
This could be as simple as a SatComm Tracker for each EV. Then give the public access to the SatComm channel.
EV telemetry is a little tricker. Maybe a separate telemetry or an internal television showing the EV dashboard.
It sounds like you will have 3 – 5 drivers.
Dear Andrea Rossi,
On the EV eCat demonstration:
1. Will the position (i.e., the GPS coordinates) be broadcast in real-time and available to the public?
2. Will speed, battery SOC, and other car parameters be broadcast in real-time and available to the public?
3. Will the event be captured for later presentation on YouTube?
4. How long (# hours) will each driver steer the car?
5. Is the racetrack in Italy?
Steven Nicholes Karels:
1. I am not expert of the matter; what I can say is that the streaming will show clearly location and time
2. yes, but security dependent
3. yes
4. 90 minutes per turn of two drivers
5. yes
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Will the day when I will be enjoying free power for my home arrive soon?
Albert:
I hope so,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Dr. Rossi,
have you been driving in the EV with the ecat by yourself?
Energy User:
Driving the car powered by the Ecat is an essential part of the preparation,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
dear Mr. Rossi will you report the results of the closed doors race?
Mitch:
Yes
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Dr. Rossi,
so when you publish the date of the EV-test (and electric heater test?) we know that the closed door race was successful?
Warm regards
Z.Roeden
Z.Roeden:
Yes,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dr Rossi
Did you take some rest during these Summer holidays ?
Ann:
Yes, 7 days last week,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Dr Rossi,
The highest part of use of electricity in the world is to make heat: make an Ecat heater, focus the advertising on this market and all the rest will come eventually.
Best
Tony
Tony:
Thank you for your suggestion,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
To Giannino Ferro Casagrande and all of you
I’m sure that it would be enough to reach one million if we all (or at least many of us) upgrade our orders with 10 percent but at least one unit.
Cheers
Dr Rossi,
When will you decide the date of the EV test ?
Anonymous:
Within the first 10 days of October we will make a closed doors race; after it we will decide how to proceed.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dr Rossi,
will conserve the same date priority any eventual variation of former pre-orders ?
Anonymous:
Yes,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Dr. Andrea Rossi, can you describe the influence of the Ecat SKlep NGU on the solar system?
Jaroslav Dobrovolny
Jaroslav Dobrovolny:
None,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
IO SONO DISPONIBILE A RADDOPPIARE IL MIO. PREORDINE !!! SE TUTTI FANNO COSI’ SI ARRIVA AL MILIONE ?
English
I can double my pre-order: if all do so will be reached the target of one million pre-orders ?
Giannino Ferro Casagrande:
About your question: could be,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Jean Paul Renoir. TU SI CHE SEI INTELLIGENTE !!! ORAMAI ABBIAMO RISOLTO TUTTI I PROBLEMI !!!!! E , PREMIO NOBEL PER ANDREA !!!
Giannino Ferro Casagrande:
To modify your pre-order you have to send a new pre-order: please go to
http://www.ecatorders.com
fill up the pre-order form with your new request and resend it back.
This is valid for all the persons that want to modify or cancel the pre-orders they already did,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dr Rossi,
Here are the updated statistics of your papers I found today in
http://www.researchgate.net/publication/330601653_E-Cat_SK_and_long_range_particle_interactions
Total Readings: 145000 ( of which 132333 only for “Ecat SK and long range particle interactions”), more than 1,500,000 papers published on Researchgate
Research Interest Score: 3021, more than 1,500,000 papers on Researchgate
Reccomandations: 11742, more than 1,500,000 publications on RG
Most Readings by Cathegories: Electronic Engineers, Chemical Engineers, Theoretical Physicists,
Most Readings by Seniority: Professors, PhD students, Researchers, Seniors
And Counting…
Prof
Prof:
Thank you for the update,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Andrea Rossi,
You Posted:
“What counts is not the speed, but the comparison of the charge of the Ecat powered car and the same model car without the Ecat, having both cars running at the same time at the same speed and compare the charges of their batteries before and after the race: the expectation is that the car with the Ecat will have the battery full after the whole 6 hours of race, while the other will have the battery discharged after at the most 3 hours. The two cars will run always at a distance of hundreds of meters between them, to avoid either one take advantage of the air vacuum.”
Speed does play a factor. If both cars were stationary, the difference would not exist.
A sample estimate from a Tesla Model 3 has a power efficiency of
kW = 0.0056 * (speed in mph)**2 + 0.1638 * speed in mph + 6.1894.
This equation will change for other that a Tesla Model 3.
You must select a speed for both EVs such that the non-equipped eCat EV, when initially fully charged, runs out of charge within 2 (or 3) hours, when run at a constant speed, except for any short pit stops.
For example, if the EV you selected has a 60kW-hrs battery system capacity and you want it to fully discharge in 2 hours (for the non-equipped EV), you would an energy consumption rate of 30 kW.
On the Tesla Model 3, that would indicate a speed of about 80 mph. So, speed does matter.
The other suggestion I would offer is:
1. At the end of 6 hours, when the eCat equipped EV if tested
2. Quickly remove the eCat equipment (if this is possible)
3. Continue the demonstration at the same conditions,
4. Until the EV runs out of charge.
5. Then the same measurements are performed.
Will both vehicles have telemetry made available in real time? Such as position, speed, and SOC?
Steven Nicholes Karels:
Thank you for your suggestions,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Andrea,
I perfectly understood the idea for the EV test, will be very,very interesting to follow!
I just wanted to correct the statement of EV cars having high normal speeds.
Best regards and good luck with EV test,
Mats Heijkenskjold
Mats Heijkenskjold:
Thank you for your kind wishes,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Dr. Rossi
I totally agree with what you said to Mats Heijkenskjold and Steven N. Karels.
considering these premises on the 2 EV Vehicles:
1) same Brand
2) same Model
3) same Size in KWh of the Battery
and considering that the only difference between the 2 EV Vehicles will be:
4) the one “prepared” by you and your Team will contain “in addition” only the ECat Modules + the interfacing electronics between the Ecat and the EV Vehicle
The speed with which the EV Vehicles will travel on the racetrack does not matter, but if:
5) after 2-3 hours the Ev vehicle without Ecat having exceeded the KM foreseen by its WLTP cycle, will stop
6) while after 6 hours the same EV vehicle with the same Size of battery in KWh will still have the battery charged…..
the only possible explanation for this thing will be that the energy consumed to advance along the racetrack that EV vehicle with Ecat on board for 6 hours without ever stopping, will have been supplied, only and exclusively, from Ecat!!!
If I understand correctly:
7) the selected racetrack will allow you to always have the 2 EV vehicles “in sight” while they travel on it
8) the change of drivers at the wheel of the Vehicle with Ecat on board will last a few seconds and will be done in a “specially chosen” area so that everything is perfectly “visible”.
9) The Ecat and the control electronics will be easily identifiable inside the EV Vehicle “prepared” by you and your Team
in addition, the verification:
A) of the “size” of the battery of the 2 EV vehicles
B) of the SoC at the start of the 2 EV vehicles
C) of the SoC at the arrival of the EV Vehicle with Ecat
D) of the SoC of the EV Vehicle without ECat when it stops
10) will be done by an independent person who is an expert in the EV Vehicle Model selected for the Demonstration, with specific instrumentation for that EV vehicle
I kindly ask you to confirm or deny these “suppositions/desires” of mine 😉
If what is described above were actually verified in your demonstration I absolutely agree with you that the speed with which the 2 EV vehicles will travel on the racetrack is NOT “absolutely” important!!! 😉
I thank you in advance for the answers/confirmations/denials that you will want to give me.
best regards
Maico
Maico:
All you wrote is correct,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Is still counting the pre-orders record and the one million pre-orders target to start the deliveries of the Ecat ?
Anonymous:
Yes
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Mats Heijkenskjold and Steven N. Karels:
What counts is not the speed, but the comparision of the charge of the Ecat powered car and the same model car without the Ecat, having both cars running at the same time at the same speed and compare the charges of their batteries bofore and after the race: the expectation is that the car with the Ecat will have the battery full after the whole 6 hours of race, while the other will have the battery discharged after at the most 3 hours. The two cars will run always at a distance of hundreds of meters between them, to avoid either one take advantage of the air vacuum.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Steven N Karels:
The speed you metioned is not normal for EV:s! Normal speeds are much lower, main roads 70 – 120 kmph.
Dear Andrea Rossi,
Facts:
1. Normal (non-equipped) EV will stop after 2 hours.
2. Test will last for 6 hours.
3. Driving faster than normal will decrease overall range.
Assumptions
1. Present EVs have a battery range around 250 to 300 miles on a single charge, at normal speeds.
Assertions:
1. Average speed will likely be between 90 and 120 mph.
2. This will cause the non-equipped EV to run out of battery charge in about two hours.
Suggestions/Questions:
1. It is not important for the text demonstration to have the equipped EV end with 100% SOC.
2. It might be safer to end up with an 80% to 90% SOC on the equipped EV (and more believable).
3. Do you plan a crew change during the 6-hour run?
4. If a pit stop is planned, how long?
Steven Nicholes Karels:
Thank you for your suggestions; answers:
1, 2. thank you for your opinion
3. yes
4. several seconds
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dr Rossi,
Do you still recommend using a battery to buffer the output of the ECat for powering household appliances, motors, and electronic devices such as TV?
Iggy
Iggy Dalrymple:
No,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Dr. Rossi,
have you already invited journalists and company representatives to the demonstration in October? Is it still possible for journalists to join you there?
Warm regards
Z.Roeden
Z. Roeden:
We have a person dedicated to this job,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Andrea I am sure that the size you have chosen of 3kW of your generator is the most appropriate for mass production. The application possibilities are endless, as an off the grid recharger or battery replacement, from small vehicles on land, water and air (mopeds, outboards and electric drones) to more or less humanoid robots (Optimus and Figure 02 have on board 3 kW approximately) not to mention all the portable power tools. In homes, one or more 3 kW modules coupled with 220 V AC inverters cover the needs of any family. I am writing these obvious things to you only to confirm that associating the next demonstration of the electric machine with your own 3 kW unit, with a 220 V AC inverter, which powers some household devices (electric stoves, induction plates that boil water, electric drills, panels bright with many lamps and so on) is an excellent idea. I think the public and journalists will be very interested in these applications in the “long” wait for the completion of the durability comparison between the two electric cars, one with and one without your charger. And it’s also a safety alternative in the unfortunate event that something goes wrong with cars, even if it’s not related to your generator.
Neri Accornero:
Welcome back !
Thank you for your suggestion, but we will not mess up the things. We will make separated demos to focus perfectly in each of them.
Besides, the Ecat system for the EV is different from the normal Ecat, because there is a complex interface system.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Yury Ekdokimov:
Thank you for your support.
Answers:
1. the race will last 6 hours: after a couple of hours the car without the Ecat will stop because the battery SOC will be exhaused, the Ecat will continue to race and when the race time will be completed the battery of it will have SOC 100%; a neutral referee expert of the EV will check the SOC of both the cars at the start and at the end
2. see 1
3. yes
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Dr. Rossi!
1. Could you please provide the methodology for the upcoming comparative experiment of an electric vehicle with ECat and an electric vehicle without ECat.
2. What quantitative result do you expect from this comparison?
3. Have there been preliminary test runs of these vehicles?
With best wishes for success and achievements in your noble work,
Yury
Dear Andrea,
Is the E-Cat NGU able to power a normal household electric space heater which heats using resistors?
Kind regards,
Frank Acland
Frank Acland:
Yes,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Hello Dr Rossi,
,,here are two recent AI _ update videos – the first is the ex CEO of Google – and long time AL pioneer – giving interesting insights to the near future and ENERGY needed to run AL // second is how AI _ will work with the scientific community.
** would be great to see your Data compiled and ran through an AI closed loop data base.
Take a quick break .. and watch these )
Ex CEO of Google speaks on AI
https://youtu.be/WOLrv-ypfXc?si=opEUgNRF1e-DxbPF
“The AI Scientist | Fully Automated Open-Ended Scientific Discovory –
https://youtu.be/_3o3U5qBPJM?si=fZQXGYfVYbsQePJV
Looking forward to your upcoming demos
Cheers,
Paul Calvo
Paul Calvo:
Thank you for the links and for your support,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dr Rossi,
Is the critical threshold of electrons density a necessary condition for the reverse difference of entropy that generates the ZPE ?
Anonymous:
See the paragraphs 5,6 of
http://www.researchgate.net/publication/330601653_E-Cat_SK_and_long_range_particle_interactions
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Andrea Rossi,
When asked about a demonstration of the supplementation by eCat technology to Solar Panels, you responded:
“the timing for this has still to be defined.”
1. Are there technical problems with this product?
2. Are there sales/marketing problems that preclude or defer the demonstration?
3. Or, other issues?
Steven Nicholes Karels:
1- no
2- no
3- yes
Warm Regards,
A.R.
𝐷𝑒𝑎𝑟 𝐴𝑛𝑑𝑟𝑒𝑎 𝑅𝑜𝑠𝑠𝑖,
𝐻𝑜𝑤 𝑞𝑢𝑖𝑐𝑘𝑙𝑦 𝑐𝑎𝑛 𝑡ℎ𝑒 𝐸-𝐶𝑎𝑡 𝑆𝐾𝐿𝑒𝑝 𝑁𝐺𝑈 𝑚𝑜𝑑𝑢𝑙𝑎𝑡𝑒 𝑓𝑟𝑜𝑚 𝑚𝑖𝑛𝑖𝑚𝑢𝑚 𝑙𝑜𝑎𝑑 𝑡𝑜 𝑚𝑎𝑥𝑖𝑚𝑢𝑚 𝑙𝑜𝑎𝑑 𝑤𝑖𝑡ℎ𝑜𝑢𝑡 𝑐𝑎𝑢𝑠𝑖𝑛𝑔 𝑎 𝑣𝑜𝑙𝑡𝑎𝑔𝑒 𝑑𝑟𝑜𝑝 𝑒𝑥𝑐𝑒𝑒𝑑𝑖𝑛𝑔 15% 𝑜𝑓 𝑡ℎ𝑒 𝑛𝑜𝑚𝑖𝑛𝑎𝑙 𝑣𝑜𝑙𝑡𝑎𝑔𝑒?
𝐶𝑢𝑟𝑟𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑙𝑦, 𝐼 𝑎𝑚 𝑢𝑠𝑖𝑛𝑔 𝑎 𝑔𝑎𝑠𝑜𝑙𝑖𝑛𝑒-𝑝𝑜𝑤𝑒𝑟𝑒𝑑 𝑖𝑛𝑣𝑒𝑟𝑡𝑒𝑟-𝑡𝑦𝑝𝑒 𝑔𝑒𝑛𝑒𝑟𝑎𝑡𝑜𝑟, 𝑏𝑢𝑡 𝑖𝑡 𝑡𝑎𝑘𝑒𝑠 𝑎𝑏𝑜𝑢𝑡 𝑜𝑛𝑒 𝑠𝑒𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑑 𝑡𝑜 𝑝𝑟𝑜𝑣𝑖𝑑𝑒 𝑎𝑑𝑑𝑖𝑡𝑖𝑜𝑛𝑎𝑙 𝑝𝑜𝑤𝑒𝑟 𝑤ℎ𝑒𝑛 𝑎𝑛 𝑒𝑥𝑡𝑟𝑎 𝑙𝑜𝑎𝑑 𝑖𝑠 𝑠𝑢𝑑𝑑𝑒𝑛𝑙𝑦 𝑎𝑝𝑝𝑙𝑖𝑒𝑑. 𝐷𝑢𝑟𝑖𝑛𝑔 𝑡ℎ𝑎𝑡 𝑜𝑛𝑒 𝑠𝑒𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑑, 𝑡ℎ𝑒 𝑙𝑖𝑔ℎ𝑡𝑠 𝑓𝑙𝑖𝑐𝑘𝑒𝑟, 𝑎𝑛𝑑 𝑡ℎ𝑒 𝑜𝑝𝑒𝑟𝑎𝑡𝑖𝑜𝑛 𝑜𝑓 𝑒𝑙𝑒𝑐𝑡𝑟𝑜𝑛𝑖𝑐 𝑑𝑒𝑣𝑖𝑐𝑒𝑠 𝑎𝑙𝑟𝑒𝑎𝑑𝑦 𝑝𝑜𝑤𝑒𝑟𝑒𝑑 𝑏𝑦 𝑡ℎ𝑒 𝑔𝑒𝑛𝑒𝑟𝑎𝑡𝑜𝑟 𝑖𝑠 𝑑𝑖𝑠𝑟𝑢𝑝𝑡𝑒𝑑.
𝐵𝑒𝑠𝑡 𝑟𝑒𝑔𝑎𝑟𝑑𝑠,
𝐾𝑜𝑒𝑛
Koen Vandewalle:
5/10th to 1″
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Andrea Rossi,
For the planned October 2024 eCat/NGU Demonstrations:
1. An EV powered by NGU Technology – is this correct?
2. A heater powered by eCat/NGU units – please verify and can you disclose the approximate Wattage?
3. A eCat/NGU supplementation to a Solar Panel(s) – is this correct?
4. Anything else?
Steven Nicholes Karels:
1. yes
2. yes; the Wattage will be disclosed during the test
3. the timing for this has still to be defined
4. no
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Dr. Rossi,
would it be possible to modify the ecat so that it does not switch off in the event of an overload? This would not be necessary, especially for resistive loads such as electric heating or electric kettle.
Best regards
Reinhard
Reinhard:
Not so far,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Andrea,
Am I correct in understanding that you will be demonstrating an E-Cat NGU powering an electric heater in October (in addition to the EV demo)?
Many thanks,
Frank Acland
Frank Acland:
Yes,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dr Rossi,
I read today on
http://www.researchgate.net/publication/330601653_E-Cat_SK_and_long_range_particle_interactions
that this paper has reached 132000 total readings: it is the most read paper of 1.5 millions of papers published on Researchgate, and counting…
Prof
Prof:
Thank you for the update,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Dr. Rossi,
nice to read your latest answers. So we see three demonstrations in October with the ecat: 1. EV-car 2. PV 3. electric heater.
Number three will be my main application for the ecat. Generally it will cover the main usage of energy consumption of a country.
I live for now in Südtirol and there it is always very cold in winter, I am eagerly awaiting the October demonstrations!
Best regards
Franz D.
Franz D.:
I agree with you,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dr Rossi
In this video Dr Nagel during a recent conference presents slides comparing common fuel with the Preparata work, Nanor and Ecat.
https://youtu.be/vKxGNhWEShU
Regards
Lorenzo
Lorenzo:
Thank you for the link,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
B.Koenig:
As I already wrote here, in October we will make a demo of it after the demo with the EV,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
According to your answer to Mr. Corneille it is no problem for an ecat to work with an electric heater.
So why you do not publish a video to this topic?
You have an 3KW ecat, an electric heater you can get for about 40 Euro.
You just have to find 15 minutes to make this short video.
B.Koenig
Dear Readers,
Please find in
http://www.rossilivecat.com
all the comments published in other posts of this blog,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dr Rossi,
I have been able to replicate your experiment described in paragraphs 6 and 7 of
http://www.researchgate.net/publication/330601653_E-Cat_SK_and_long_range_particle_interactions
Giuseppe Tozzi
Giuseppe Tozzi:
Confratulations !
If you like, please send the report of your experiment to
ar.123@mail.com
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dr Rossi
October will be a hot month: EV demo and Ecat NGU demo. Will both be put in streaming ?
Best
JPR
Jean Paul Renoir:
Yes,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Andrea Rossi.
Residential Home – EV Commute Analysis
The Average USA Residential home consumes 29 kW-hrs of electricity per day.
The average maximum commute (one-way) is 45 minutes.
Assume a one-way commute distance of 45 miles.
Also assume an EV efficiency of 0.25 kW/mile.
The daily of 90 miles consumes 22.5 kW of energy.
Adding an EV charger to the residential home means a daily energy consumption of about 52 kW-hrs.
The average power requirement is 52 kW-hrs/24 hrs = 2.2 kW.
Assume use of 25 100W 12VDC NGU devices connected in serial to produces 2.5 kW, 300VDC @ 8.33 Amps.
Add one EG4 18KPS-12V hybrid inverter with two each Wall Mount batteries, each with 280 Ah @ 51.2V capacity.
Of the approximately 60 kW–hrs produced per day, the excess 8 kW-hrs will be sent to the electrical grid.
Cost
The cost of the NGU devices is estimated to be $6,250 USD.
The cost of the EG4 inverter with two battery systems is $11,790 USD.
Estimate the total cost to install is $20,000 USD.
Assuming a monthly electrical bill avoidance of $300 USD, the proposed system will pay for itself in about 66 months or 5.5 years.
This likely less expensive than an EV NGU onboard charging system.
Steven Nicholes Karels,
Thank you for your insight,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Can the Ecat power any kind of lamps and any kind of electric heaters without necessity of any kind of interfacing device ?
Louis Corneille:
Yes
Warm Regards
A.R.
Dear Andrea,
For the EV demonstration,
1. Will you be comparing the performance of an EV charged by an E-Cat against the performance of the same EV model with a battery charged in the standard way?
2. Will they both have the same model battery?
Many thanks,
Frank Acland
Frank Acland:
1- yes
2- yes
Warm Regards
A.R.
389 / 5.000
Hello Dr. Rossi!
The situation is there:
Due to the deliberate destruction of infrastructure such as the power supply in Ukraine, there is a need for e-cat!
I will also soon need an energy source such as the e-cat in the kW range due to a major renovation.
My urgent advice is therefore to use e-cat for domestic use before using it in vehicles.
I hope you have good efficiency.
Feedback geben
Heinz Sause:
Surely the Ecat for appliances will be delivered well before the EV version, because they are only part of the complex system for the EV.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Hello Mr. Rossi,
are the test of the new ecat ngu completed? When will you publish the new data-sheet?
Warm regards
Alex
Alex:
The tests will never end, even eventually after the deliveries will begin: the evolution will never end.
The data sheet are already published on
http://www.ecat.com
Warm Regards,
Andrea Rossi
To all our Italian Readers:
Buon Ferragosto !
From the Ecat Team
The efficiency of 90-95%, corresponding to a loss of 5-10% due to the interfacing is magnificent, after the expected COP of the energy generation,
Best
Yuri
Yuri:
Correct,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
This is Summer holidays time: may I ask you how you are spending your holidays ?
Anonymous:
Our Team is working almost full time. Too much work to do; personally, I will just enjoy the weekends to rest and play tennis,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Dr. Rossi,
what is the efficiency achieved in your interface for charging an electric vehicle battery?
Best wishes to you and your work,
Yury Evdokimov
Yury Evdokimov:
Good question: should be between 90 and 95%,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Hello Dr. Rossi,
a few months ago you shown us a picture in which the ecat works with an electric heater?
Will you show us this demonstration also in October in a short video?
Warm regards
Walter
Walter:
Thank you for the suggestion,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Andrea,
If I use the E-Cat to charge batteries for the power supply in the house and then charge the EV via the mains plug, do I also need EV-specific electronics?
Best regards
Wilfried
Wilfried:
No,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Good morning Doctor Rossi
Campers are usually equipped with a photovoltaic panel that recharges one or two lithium batteries.
Inside the campers there are both 12 volt and 220 volt (inverter) sockets for various uses.
The refrigerator is usually bivalent (12-220) or trivalent (also gas).
However, there is (externally) a 220 volt connection to connect the camper in the rest areas, this allows you to recharge the batteries and manage all electricity consumption.
In your opinion, can a 1 or 2 KW Ecat replace the solar panel or can it be connected directly to the external 220 volt input?
Good day
Gavino Mamia:
Sorry to have written the initial of your family name with a small letter: obviously it has been a typo…now it has been corrected,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dott. Rossi, Gregory Daigle si riferiva al fatto che Dewey ha scritto 2015 invece di 2025 :-)))
Gregory Daigle was referring to the fact that Dewey wrote 2015 instead of 2025 (LOL)
Gavino Mamia:
Your example is a typical example of a duty the Ecat can do. The EV situation is a completely different technology every manufacturer has his own intellectual property of.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Hello Andrea
Two month ago we had following exchange:
M.M.: Last month you have shown high vacuum system in a lab of Leonardo Corporation which is used to make the E-Cat SKLep NGU.It would be appreciated if you could show other parts of the lab and the workshop with the many prototypes you have built till now. A photo of some of your coworkers would be a delight.
A.R.answer: We may only publish images that do not unveil particulars we deem restricted; notwithstanding this, we will publish some more images,
I am still impatiently waiting to see this new images.
Best regards
Miha
M.M.:
We will in due time. Too bad for your impatience.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Dr. Rossi,
The “complex interface” needed to allow an external e-cat to charge an EV overnight would be of huge benefit to those people who reside in apartments and condos. Do you plan to sell the required “complex interface” along with the e-cat upon request? Does this interface need to be custom made for each car manufacture? Or can you team make a universal “custom interface” in the near future?
Looking forward to you EV demo.
Best Regards,
Daniel G. Zavela
Daniel G. Zavela:
1- normally the interface will not be necessary for non EV applications, but specific situations must be analyzed
2- probably yes
3- so far I am not able to answer
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Andrea,
Some questions about the complex interface you have developed for the EV, if you don’t mind.
1) Is this interface necessary for the charging of all EV batteries?
2) Does this interface need to be different for different brands of EV batteries?
3) Is this interface necessary for charging non-EV batteries (e.g. phones, computers)
Many thanks,
Frank Acland
Frank Acland:
1- yes
2- probably
3- no
Warm Regards,
A.R.
B.Waltz:
Thank you for the links,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Dr. Rossi
I haven’t contributed to his blog for a long time.
Obviously I follow his “evolutions” in the development of his E-Cat which has now reached the NGU version daily on http://www.rossilivecat.com/ and Jonp.
I know that in the short term he has planned 2 demos and from his answers on JoNP I understood this (I ask you to confirm if possible):
1) The first, called E-Cat EV, and planned for October, envisages that a “substantial” array of Ecat NGUs will be interconnected with specifically designed and particularly advanced electronics to a Full Electric vehicle. This interconnection has the purpose of recharging the battery of the EV Vehicle while driving. This “challenging” development has been carried out by you and your Team and the demo in question will aim to demonstrate that the EV Vehicle can travel, without ever stopping, the track of a racetrack specially selected to “record and document” the extraordinary nature of what you and your team were able to do. Can you kindly confirm?
2) The Second, still to be planned and the main details of which are not yet known (so I’m imagining), which has the aim of demonstrating that by integrating another application under development into a “Solar System”, on a E-Cat NGU, it will be possible to “multiply” the performance of the Solar System itself. (during the day by adding the production of the solar system to that of the E-Cat NGUs, at night making the solar system produce even in the absence of sun 😉 ). Can you kindly confirm?
What has just been written is not the “main” reason for my intervention, but I took advantage of it, if you want to respond, to have confirmation from you of what I have more or less understood by reading your answers given to date.
I therefore thank you in advance for your willingness to respond.
Let’s get to the main reason that pushed me to write to you…..
I have seen that in the last 2 days your readers, imagining the “gigantic effort” that you and your team have made to integrate the E-Cat NGU inside an EV vehicle and therefore with the vehicle in motion (the on-board electronics of any EV vehicle do not allow the insertion of “additional modules”, nor integration with “energy systems” unrelated to the vehicle itself), they asked you direct questions about the possibility of using E-Cat NGU arrays, appropriately adapted, to recharge an EV vehicle when stationary, i.e. using the standard connections and interfaces with which all EV vehicles are equipped for charging.
One type of these charging systems is called Wallbox.
The question is legitimate since the integration of the E-Cat NGU to recharge the battery of a moving Electric Vehicle is “an order of magnitude more complex” (therefore much more difficult to achieve) compared to the creation of a “E-Cat Wallbox”.
Obviously only you know the technical characteristics of the E-Cat NGU and therefore the problems to overcome to achieve what other readers have asked you and what I am trying to ask you now :).
The integration that you and your team have created with the EV vehicle, for charging the battery while the vehicle is moving, is something “amazing” as well as very complex, and obviously we are all eager to “be able to admire”, in October, this WONDER, thanks to the demonstration it is creating…..
Having said this, I’ll try to go a little further and ask the question that prompted me to send you this post:
3) It is no coincidence that, given the challenges he had to face to create the demo of the E-Cat EV, he has actually already tackled the study and development of the “E-Cat Wallbox” which on paper should be simpler (obviously, I speak “by sensation” not knowing the complexity and technical characteristics of the E-Cat NGU) and therefore with his answers to us readers he was trying to “keep the secret” as he would have announced the existence of this “prototype/product” directly at the “E-Cat EV” demonstration in October?
I’m sorry if I was “too invasive” with this intervention, and I sincerely hope I have been “well interpreted”.
the answers you have given in these last hours have certainly worried us readers a little and therefore I preferred to “go straight to the point” and ask you the direct question….
4) Is it possible to imagine that a “prototype” of the “E-Cat Wallbox” could also be presented at the E-Cat EV Demos in October?
as anticipated, I sincerely hope that I have not been too “invasive and bold” with my questions and I thank you if you want to answer
Regards
Maico
Maico:
1- correct
2- thank you
3- actually, when a questions pulls out restricted information, we must be careful
4- no
Warm Regards,
A.R.
https://youtu.be/FP0VjeRap04?si=HA4lPiLcfHoxqkeL
Sam:
Thank you also for this link,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Hello DR Rossi
Energy from the Vacuum and
Challenging the 2nd Law of
Thermodynamics.
https://youtu.be/M0D4TGotTI8?si=N9p94S4tuVUJfCRn
Regards
Sam
Sam:
Thank you for the link,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dr. Rossi, additional here a presentation of Amy Eskridge to anti-gravitation:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FmhFKiq6FG8
B.Walz
Dear Dr. Rossi!
Due to the murder of Amy Eskridge, I would like to point out how important it is to secure scientific findings in many places in the event of a sudden death (or alleged suicide), including in foreign countries. In addition, these should then be made known unconditionally to the public/all important and competing state leaders. There is no better life insurance!
It is equally important not only to leave the country at the first threat, but also to leave the entire political sphere of influence in which these secret services have access.
I wish the best for your invention!
Yours sincerely
B.Walz
Dear Andrea Rossi,
EVs, by the nature, are designed to accept electrical power from charging stations. Otherwise, they would not function after the EV battery system is depleted.
So, an EV can accept power from a compatible charging system. There are two “flavors” of EV charging systems: AC and DC. The AC systems use the EV’s onboard charger to convert the AC power to battery power. They provide slow charging rates. Some of the larger charging stations use direct DC power for fast charging. Here, the EV onboard converter is bypassed when using a direct DC charging station. The logic within the EV handles the different charging modes.
What I had suggested was for residential charging, where the Wall Unit is normally powered by grid power, that NGU devices, coupled with an appropriate inverter, could provide the power to the Wall Unit. Nothing more.
Steven Nicholes Karels:
You are right: a normal EV can be recharged from the grid, as well as from a column, but not from the Ecat, unless we put a complex interface: this is a fa
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Andrea again,
Ok, I fully understand what you and Karels discussed earlier about the EVs and ecats.
Sorry but I am talking about an EV which is parked connected to 240V AC 1-phase charging, may be limited to low current for instance 6A. WHy is this application different from what you said in your answer: ” I did absolutely NOT say that you cannot put Ecats in series, and as well in parallels to power general appliances, electric motors etc !”.
Best regards and hope you will succeed!
Mats Heijkenskjold
Mats Heijkenskjold:
Understood,
thank you for your kind wishes,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Andrea,
Ok, thank you for the answer!
Sorry I am a little puzzled, that means you can´t use the ecats in series for other puposes, for instance to power a heat pump via an inverter. I have intended to use them that way, it is a pity!
Best regards,
Mats Heijkenskjold
Mats Heijkenskjold:
Probably we have a reciprocal misunderstanding, and I am sorry for that: I did absolutely NOT say that you cannot put Ecats in series, and as well in parallels to power general appliances, electric motors etc !
What I said answering my friend Steven Nicholes Karels is that in the EVs the situation is completely different, because the car manufacturers adopt systems to forbid the application of systems that are not specifically engineered by them. In fact, they cancel all the guarantees and certifications if their customer tries to modify the power system. Our Team spent more than one year to resolve all the problems deriving from this “rejecting” system. I hope now you can understand.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Andrea,
Steven Nicholes Karels wrote:
“The point I was trying to make is that:
1. A sufficient number of NGU devices could be connected,
2. To run an inverter, which in turn, produces AC power,
3. Which powers an EV Wall Mount,
4. Which charges an EV while it is parked”
I have 2 EV:s one with 240V AC 1-phase charging and the other 400V AC 3-phase.
I don´t understand why it is not possible to use the idea of above cited from Steven Karels for the 240V AC 1-phase? It should be the normal use, more or less, for an e-cat in series connection.
Andrea could you please explain!
Best regards
Mats Heijkenskjold
Mats Heijkenskjold:
Sorry, the answer would imply disclosing of restricted information,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Dr. Rossi,
Just curious, will we get a look at the combination of E-Cat and solar panel before the ev demonstration?
Ron Stringer
Ron Stringer:
No, we will make two separated demos,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Caro Andrea Rossi
Attualmente il problema è la ricarica delle batterie con l’auto in funzione o è stato risolto.
Se è questo il punto, ecco come vedo una delle soluzioni.
Dividi la batteria dell’auto in due A e B, essendo cariche L’E-cat montato per la ricarica è attualmente disattivato.
Auto in movimento.
Inizialmente l’auto funzionerà solo con la batteria A quando questa sarà scarica, il circuito di controllo , commuterà istantaneamente sulla batteria B
mentre la batteria A staccata, verrà commutata al E-Cat per la ricarica.
A macchina spenta, alternativamente verranno ricaricate entrambe AeB..
Per sicurezza sarebbe opportuno montare due E-Cat e usarli alternativamente in modo da controllare il loro corretto funzionamento.
Saluti e buon lavoro.
English synopsis:
Suggestions how to recharge the ERV battery during the motion
Erasmo Bardelli:
Thank you for your suggestions, but we already resolved the very complex problem, otherwise we couldn’t make the demo; the issue put by Steven N. Karels is another: is the system invented to interface the Ecat with the EV battery necessary also to recharge the EV battery while the EV is not turned on? The answer has been YES.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Andrea Rossi,
“Steven Nicholes Karels:
It does not work that way; to recharge the EV battery even if the EV is not turned on, there is the same necessity of interfacing.”
The point I was trying to make is that:
1. A sufficient number of NGU devices could be connected,
2. To run an inverter, which in turn, produces AC power,
3. Which powers an EV Wall Mount,
4. Which charges an EV while it is parked.
But it would be much more desirable for an onboard unit to charge while the EV is operating.
Steven Nicholes Karels:
Thank you for your suggestions, but they are not applicable in our specific situation
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dr Rossi,
Here are the updated stats of your papers on researchgate I found today on
http://www.researchgate.net/publication/330601653_E-Cat_SK_and_long_range_particle_interactions
Total Readings: 144015 (of which 131586 of “Ecat SK and Long Range Particle Interactions”) more than 99% of the papers on Researchgate
Research Interest Score: 2991, more than 99% of papers on RG
Recommendations plus Citations: 11616, more than 99% of papers on RG
Most Readings by Cathegories: Electronic Engineering, Energy Engineering, Chemical Engineering, Physics, Research
Most Readings by Seniority: Professors, PhD Students, Seniors
Most Readings by Geographic Areas: Asia, Europe, America
And counting…
Prof
Prof:
Thank you for the update,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Andrea,
Is it necessary to reach Sigma 5 before you do the EV demonstration with the E-Cat NGU?
Thank you,
Frank Acland
Frank Acland:
No
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Andrea Rossi,
“Even if the EV is not turned on, still it would be necessary the interfacing system”
You could configure the NGU devices to be like an EV charging station. Plug into the EV Charging port in compliance with the appropriate EV specification.
But an onboard unit is much more desirable.
Steven Nicholes Karels:
It does not work that way; to recharge the EV battery even if the EV is not turned on , there is the same necessity of interfacing.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Dr. Rossi,
Based upon your testing of an onboard EV charger, would an e-cat external EV charger for overnight charging require an adapter/interface? Or would the e-cat be a direct plug-in to the EV charging port?
Best of luck wih your up coming demo.
Best Regards,
Daniel G. Zavela
Daniel G. Zavela:
Even if the EV is not turned on, still it would be necessary the interfacing system,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Another about how Professor Weinberg
started doing Scientific Research.
https://youtu.be/gy-d8gBkAls?si=u6oypF0vTrwgvVPZ
Sam:
Thank you for your links,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Hello DR Rossi
This is a Lecture by the late
Steven Weinberg called Mapping
the Quantum World.
https://youtu.be/qco5blUfI6k?si=d_iH22IYT09ul9cr
Becoming interested in Physhics.
https://youtu.be/VqMPFo9Ij4Y?si=dlSzWF6Ljj6lr8Cw
Regards
Sam
Joseph Fine,
Thanks for the reply. I was off by a factor of 100 as I missed the %.
An on/off switch is not required. A control can activate/deactivate each unit.
To reach 5 Sigma will require a great number of NGU test units and/or a very long time.
Steven Nicholes Karels
If a .00003% probability is the 5 Sigma threshold, that is a failure criteria of 3 * 10^(-7) or 3 parts in 10 million. That might mean that 10 million E-cats should have 3 or fewer problems during a warranty period.
Cycling a single E-CAT NGU on and off 3.333 million times (or 10 E-CATS cycling for 333,333 times) may break the on/off switches, but is hardly the best test of the E-Cats themselves.
‘
But there would have to be far fewer than ’60’ failures in 1,000,000 units. ( Maybe that’s acceptable for the switches! )
Anyway, that’s just my opinion.
Regards,
Joseph Fine
Prof. Joseph Fine,
5 Sigma Testing Question
Would a valid way of test NGU devices be:
1. An ensemble of NGU devices, say 10.
2. Each device is tested in the same manner.
3. Start with an Off condition, turn on, wait a fixed number of seconds until the output is stable,
4. If the output is within specified parameters, score as a success, otherwise a failure.
5. Turn of the NGU device.
6. Repeat the sequence for a total of 1,000,000 observations for ensemble.
7. If the number of failures is less than 60, declare 5 Sigma success.
Prof Joseph Fine:
Exactly,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Mathfan,
For more information on Five-Sigma or Sigma-Five, see: https://home.cern/resources/faqs/five-sigma.
It’s the Gaussian probability distribution.
” A result that has a statistical significance of five sigma means the almost certain likelihood that a bump in the data is caused by a new phenomenon, rather than a statistical fluctuation. Scientists calculate this by measuring the signal against the expected fluctuations in the background noise across the whole range. For some results, whose anomalies could lie in either direction above or below the expected value, a significance of five sigma is the 0.00006% chance the data is fluctuation. ( or a 0.00003% likelihood of a statistical fluctuation, that exceeds the five-sigma value on one half of the normal distribution graph). “
Mathfan,
When you roll a six-sided die from a pair of dice, the probability of getting a ‘3’ (or a 5 etc.) is 1/6 (0.1666). If you roll the same die 5 times, the probability of getting the same number is (1/6)^5 = .0001286 . That is about 128 times out of 1 million. When 1 million e-cats have been delivered, no one would want 128 problems.
The Sigma 5 test must be more stringent than 128 examples out of a million.
Statistical regards,
Joseph Fine
@/P
The concept of Sigma 5 is this: assume you throw a dice: if one of the 6 numbers, for example 3, wins one time, it is normal = Sigma 1 probability, if exits 2 times, it is almost normal = Sigma 2, 3 times rare = Sigma 3, 4 times very rare = Sigma 4, 5 times impossible = Sigma 5: it means all the faces are equal = 3. In the case of the Ecat tests, means that successful operation is always possible after enough number of tests to exhaust any possibility of unsuccessful event.
Best
Mathfan
Dear Mr Rossi,
I have a question regarding your sigma 5 tests. What kind of event/phenomenon are you measuring that should result in 99.9999% probability?
Best regards
/P
/P:
Sorry, it regards series of factors that are confidential, although this allows to imagine the series of difficulties we had to overcome.
Warm Regards,
A.R.