Rossi Blog Reader
This website tracks recent postings to Andrea Rossi's
Journal of Nuclear Physics,
sorting the entries with priority to Rossi's answers, which appear under each question.
• Email to Andrea Rossi - Journal Of Nuclear Physics
• Website comments to the Webmaster (who has no contact or connection with Rossi).
• Updated: 2026-01-20 03:30:10.337401Z
Dear Mr. Rossi,
I think I was one of the first to pre-order, but since that was so long ago, I no longer have the email address I used for the pre-order. What should I do?
Herwig Lautner:
If you sent us our pre-order form, it is listed and you don’t need to take any action; when the turn of your delivery will arrive you will be contacted to update your non binding pre-order into a regular order,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
I had booked for:
two units
ten units
That was very early on at your first call for ordering the 100W e-cats. I have the emails. What do you recommend that I should do?
Albert:
Nothing. When the delivery of your pre-order will be ready, you will be contacted to agree to turn the not binding pre-order into a regular and updated order,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
I am reading the deliveries are on course, but when will I be contacted ? Have I do redo my pre-order ?
Giannino Ferro Casagrande:
When the delivery of your pre-order will be ready you will be contacted; I am not able to give you a scheduling, so far.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Iggy Dalrymple,
Good question. The more general question is whether the NGU technology energy production process will degrade over time, independent of what energy conversion process is used.
I understand the expected energy production lifetime is 100,000 hours. That is likely computed. The actual lifetime value will be estimated by a large ensemble of units operating over a long period of time (years, not days).
I, myself, do not understand how the NGU unit works, although I have my guesses. I look at the NGU unit as a “black box” and ignore how it works and speculate how it could be employed.
Dr Rossi,
When Axil alluded to the theory that the interior surfaces of the NGU might be sensitive to photonic energy and might be converting that energy into electrical energy you replied that the NGU did not use solar panels. Granted, solar panels are not used but could Axil be correct that the interior surfaces of the NGU could be converting photonic energy into electrical energy?
Regards,
Iggy
Iggy Dalrymple:
I do not give information in positive or in negative to this issue; I confirm that the Ecat technology has nothing to resemble a solar panel,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Hi Andrea!
I don’t know if this solid state battery news interests you. This journalist’s thorough viability analysis is similar to what I went through with you a few years ago.
Samsung has announced something similar. The one-two punch of E-Cat + Donut Labs will be amazing – maybe ‘interim’ until E-Cat supports mobility.
This video is a bit long –
Spoiler – the big money for Donut Lab came from Aura ring! This will likely kill the internal combustion engine. Donut Labs is building also building a giant factory at an undisclosed location (in Finland).
https://youtu.be/RbGxbII44eE?si=A9eUg2uswVAZWnHy
Greg Smith:
Thank you for the link,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dr Rossi
Will the Ecat NGU produce also heat ?
Best,
Jannik
Jannik:
Of course yes ! The major part of energy consume in the world is to make heat,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Andrea, I don’t understand why some people on the blog insist on considering your generator a photovoltaic system. Your publication and the Australian patent don’t mention photocells, but only energy extraction from coherence modulation of a cloud of electrons. On the other hand, I really don’t believe there are photocells with an efficiency higher than 20-25%, and therefore, to generate the 10 W of your first prototype, no photovoltaic cell with that efficiency could fit within 3 cm3. Could you at least clarify this point to avoid fanciful assumptions about its operation?
Thanks
Neri
Neri Accornero:
Obviously the Ecat has nothing to do with any kind of solar panel,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
@2026-01-15 11:00 Hans Weser
The lifetime of the NGU core is governed by the same influences that affect solar cell lifetimes. The surface of the optical cavity of the NGU that converts light into electrical power uses the same types of solid state materials that are used in solar cells. Understanding how and way solar cells degrade over time will inform how the NGU core degrades over time. The AI explains how a solar cell ages as follows:
Click on the following link if appropriate or load this link into the command line and execute.
https://www.google.com/search?q=is+the+life+expectancy+of+a+solar+cell+proportional+to+the+time+it+is+exposed+to+sunlight&sca_esv=492d03d456b59a14&sxsrf=ANbL-n4WiqQI6SHRG9GAjplAD0KEtLXu0A%3A1768521692078&fbs=ADc_l-aN0CWEZBOHjofHoaMMDiKpaEWjvZ2Py1XXV8d8KvlI3o6iwGk6Iv1tRbZIBNIVs-5-bUj3iBl-UxHsANYwOkWWQqZAJJdwuRaSoLHfELMHAQFneUwKM50jpvR3lgPoPKPocSAVLVIC1tmtj18NQh34sJoMKkeMLmVT0BQXR6brJvbElwncIYMxPc2e7aIP7xyAYnsJEw_6y0zcNxiTmikcViftsA&aep=1&ntc=1&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwjWh-_Z4I6SAxVQLFkFHaTYGgQQ2J8OegQIEhAE&biw=1265&bih=607&dpr=1.52&aic=0&nem=143&mstk=AUtExfAH5S5NUTOZHbYBhM5hS6Gtb29uRgmZ52fT1LamHt9H2GQIEzyQ_We_XIm7s_GeqIJkZZ0sBFz1xvLZsrKwqI6160oelQoEfXIa6U9gmAx5gM-ISfucyrmb4tguaDA_NGQjsUHFHnbeHg-ktlu8c9pTzABN9bE64oSa9kxwiaJDE5MxO2BgG35-GXJy6IR5uyBH71gBW2DON9malAza4boHJL7saMlkVe8h9l6Tiq9ETaZL0WSBFp-SXtRKTpI86L5sQ-iwkDq2m1vjehIwbSPOfVK8fYVovg5wnjbe0kUa82OZ17Yo67SVii7AhP_oeOd5TJlKBD-eYE-TwlP3RCAWSUZAwV4hEaUMpEDk_AlqchuJpHeKRZPffGzBgR2pY7kafTzDg4-dwnXDHVzWYHEn1VB184ahUU4&csuir
Dear Mr. Rossi,
The expected operational lifetime of the E-Cat NGU is up to 100,000 hours.
1. Does the operating lifetime increase if the E-Cat NGU only runs for half a day?
2. Does the operating lifetime increase even more if the E-Cat runs only one day a week?
3. Or is the maximum operating lifetime the same either way?
Hans Weser:
1. no
2. nonsense
3. see above
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dr Rossi,
Congratulations for resolving in short time the issues emerged in the delivered Ecats so far,
All the best,
Jorge
Jorge:
Thank you for your support,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Given that deliveries have already started, is some event or announcement still planned, as anticipated some time back, for January 20? We are all eager and impatient to see to current incarnation of the ECAT most of us have been waiting for over the last 15 years or so.
An hopeful fan
Piero:
Within January will be published the monthly report on EcatWorld,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
@ Camillo and all readers:
Do people truly exist who possess unique and mysterious abilities, capable of influencing matter purely with their mind?
One of the most famous examples in Italy was Gustavo Adolfo Rol, who lived in Turin (1903–1994).
For decades he carried out countless “experiments” — as he himself called them — in the presence of credible, often prominent witnesses from the worlds of culture, politics, and business, leaving them utterly astonished.
Rol appeared to have mastery over space, time, energy, and matter.
Phenomena occurred both in his immediate presence and at enormous distances, without any physical intervention on his part.
There were no tricks or hidden devices: according to those who saw them, everything happened solely through the power of his mind and a profound spiritual connection.
Words alone cannot adequately describe Gustavo Rol, and listing everything he was reportedly capable of would fill many pages.
Among the most frequently mentioned phenomena are: reading closed books, materializations and dematerializations, telepathy, clairvoyance, precognition, real-time alteration of paintings, and much more.
The best way to begin to understand this enigmatic figure — without rushing to judgment or uncritical enthusiasm — is to watch some of the many documentaries and eyewitness accounts available on YouTube.
Numerous friends, intellectuals, and acquaintances still recount, with emotion and vivid detail, the extraordinary events they witnessed.
Through these testimonies shines a powerful suggestion: that there exists a far vaster and deeper level of reality beyond the purely material universe accessible to our limited senses — a glimpse of a spiritual dimension that may transcend what we ordinarily consider “real.”
Kind Regards,
Italo R.
Dr Rossi:
How goes the problem solving with the Ecat plant you are building?
Regards, Ecat Enthusiast
Ecat Enthusiast:
We have resolved the problems,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dr. Rossi: Congratulations on delivering units for the 1 MW assembly. Also, I am pleased to hear that most of the ecat units are being manufactured by the licensee. Transferring the intellectual property and practical manufacturing knowledge is a big step toward commercial success.
You predicted that January 20, 2026 would be the delivery of the ecat unit to a customer. My questions are:
1). Is that date still the target?
2). What is the nature of the “delivery”?
a). An assembled unit will be delivered to another entity of the licensee.
b). An assembled unit will be delivered to a separate corporate entity nor part of the licensee’s.
I look forward of seeing a successful ecat delivery with many more to come!
Thomas Kaminski:
1- as I said here the deliveries have already started
2- a “delivery” has the nature of a delivery
2a- no
2b- yes
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Dr. Rossi,
What do your partners think about cooperation with state governments? A demonstration for ministers could significantly boost the expansion of Ecat production. And that should be the goal.
Best regards
Franz D.
Franz D.:
Give to Cesar what is of Caesar,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Andrea Rossi,
“The Aeroscraft ML868 aircraft is designed to be powered by three diesel aircraft engines, each producing 4,425 hp, for a total power output of approximately 13,275 hp.
The ML868 is a large, rigid-body, variable-buoyancy airship designed for heavy cargo transport, capable of carrying a 250-ton (500,000 lb) payload over 5,100 nautical miles. The engines provide both forward thrust and vectoring capabilities for controlled flight and landing, utilizing a patented buoyancy management system.
It is important to note that the current generation of Aeroscraft vehicles are planned to use hydrogen fuel cell propulsion systems for zero-emission flight, moving toward a carbon-free electric grid for power, which would change the power specifications from the earlier diesel models. The horsepower equivalent for these electric propulsion systems would be substantial, in the thousands of horsepower range.”
How about replacing the envisioned hydrogen fuel cell with NGU technology?
Steven Nicholes Karels:
We are not ready for this kind of applications,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
The NGU reactor will serve as another probe into the ultimate nature of the vacuum.
Understanding the vacuum and the ultimate nature of space time is a paramount issue that faces current science. To explore the coherent nature of the various quantum fields requires a direct and impactful probe and the NGU provides that.
For example, current vacuum theory assumes that the generation of electron/positron pairs as virtual particles happens routinely in the vacuum. But the NGU NEVER shows any electron pair annulation gamma production based on such virtual particle pair production. The only such pair production that is seen in the vacuum is photon pair production.
To advance future science, it is critical that the NGU is eventually integrated into the pantheon of the science tool kit taking its place with the following:
Physical Sciences & Observation
Advanced Imaging Technologies Electron microscopes, MRI scanners, and CT scanners provide enhanced observation capabilities at both the molecular level and within living organisms or large structures (like fossils).
Cutting-edge Telescopes and Observatories Instruments such as the James Webb Space Telescope (JWST) and the Laser Interferometer Gravitational-Wave Observatory (LIGO) are opening new frontiers in astronomy and cosmology by observing the early universe and detecting gravitational waves.
Novel Materials Research into new materials like metal-organic frameworks (MOFs) and self-healing materials is enabling progress in areas like carbon capture, energy-efficient air conditioning, and developing more sustainable products.
Quantum computing tech that the NGU quantum mechanical breakthroughs will revolutionize.
The integration of these diverse tools, particularly the convergence of AI with experimental methods, is currently the most significant driver of scientific advancement, and the NGU will supercharge that acceleration in the advancement of science.
Axil:
Presently we cannot do it; we will insert your suggestion in our R&D programs when we will have completed the execution of the urgent priorities we presently have; anyway, thank you for your suggestions,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Are you permitted to reveal if the final issues left in the 22Kv fielding design is (1) located within the internal workings of the NGU reactor or (2) the interface between the new external NGU interface with the grid based application function and the NGU.
(2) would support more confidence in eventual resolution of that new type of interface as opposed to (1) a rework of the design of the reactor itself implying year long retesting all the other reactor interfaces as was done with the lithium ion battery charging issue.
Axil:
Thank you for your insight,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Readers:
I’m an electronics physicist and I’ve been able to view the motor in various versions in a friend’s lab. I’ll tell you right away that it DOESN’T work. But this is only half the truth… I’ll give you my version of the facts. That motor INCREDIBLY WORKS from time to time, exactly as Yildiz says. How is this possible? It depends on how “open” you are, let’s say; if you’re not, stop reading, as this is certainly not physics. … If you heroically continue, well… there are individuals “gifted” with strange powers that they don’t even know they have; I’ve known some incredible ones. But as a physicist, I know I can’t be believed unless I demonstrate. When the Turk Yildiz (Author of the motor) goes through particular situations, he becomes what I call an “Activator.” What is an “ACTIVATOR”? Said in evangelical language it sounds like this: “Faith is that thing that if you have a grain of millet of it… and you say to that mountain, move…” Well, there are people with this “faith” they are called “PARAGNOSTICS” (the most used term). They are distinguished between those who know they are and those who don’t understand it (the Turk is of this second type). To stay on topic I’m only talking about the second type. The Turk, when he is in a particular state of “grace”, can manage (command… create) matter with his “will”, in short he performs a kind of miracle… Of course! If Jesus does it for Christianity it’s true and it’s called a MIRACLE, but if it’s done by anyone (a nobody, so to speak) then since it’s not Jesus it’s a trick. This attitude is systematic among my colleagues and in general in all scientific circles (we only believe in repeatability). Anyway, I’ll end by telling you what happens in this specific case. At certain moments, Il Turco starts off convinced he can do it and adjusts it in a way that works… Miracle!!!! The motor produces energy out of nothing. Eureka! he says enthusiastically. He tries to test it for a while and it works. Unfortunately, after a while, something always happens: the magnets come loose, the wiring gets dislodged, etc. No worries, he starts over again, hoping to improve by increasing the precision, having no idea that the real factor is himself with his faith/energy… I was called in for this specific case too, but unfortunately Il Turco wasn’t there. I learned that many magnets literally crumbled after a while. In short, the poor Turco started over again, always trying to overcome breakages of all kinds. In reality, he won’t be able to do so because: 1) the motor needs its energy to start and with nothing else it won’t work; 2) it won’t be replicable by others and therefore unusable; 3) its operation will always have a more or less long but finite time limit… limited, that is, after which it breaks. There have been other cases with “activators” who were convinced they had discovered perpetual motion that actually produced a surplus… but they always ran into problems. There is a motor (so to speak) that produced a surplus that had a certain resonance (Perendev or variations). But alas, all creations work for a while, and above all, they work ONLY with certain particular individuals who are endowed with, let’s say, “faith.” Even if these gadgets are stable and function without breakdowns… after a while, the environment suffers: appliances that break, cars that won’t start, abnormal fires, etc. So this path to producing energy is not viable. I only feel sorry for the poor wretches “gifted” with strange faculties but unaware… who get insults, disbelief, and a probable nervous breakdown. To tell this story, knowing my physics colleagues, what did I do? I wrote a fantasy book “Dreaming of Atlantis” (it’s free to download) in which I introduce the concept under the table.
Dr. Rossi:
1. When might the Global Licensee make a public announcement? Any idea?
2. It sounds like the Global Licensee may be using the first ecats to power a data center, which would be ideal as it produces no waste heat and makes no noise, and so should incur few permitting issuer.
Thanks,
Jim Rice
Dear Rossi,
The world is unsure what component manufacturing is required to produce the E-cat. Would you be able to describe a box that contains the machinery necessary to produce the important components for the E-cuts of proprietary parts? I am unsure if this is produced on a computer chip manufacturing process or if it even needs that. Could you tell us the minimum cubic meter size I can contain equipment in a box on Earth to produce that element? My reason for asking is whether or not we could go to someplace like Mars and produce these energy elements independently there sometime in the future and what would be required to do that.
Todd Burkett:
Obviously this kind of information has been totally delivered to our Global Licensee in exclusive, therefore it is restricted,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dr. Rossi,
If you can say…
1) Now that deliveries are underway, is it safe to assume that Ecat production is ramping up significantly?
2) Is your global partner currently producing most of the Ecats, or is that shared with your team?
Best Wishes,
WaltC
WaltC:
1- yes
2- our Global Licensee is producing most of the Ecats,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
The question arises: how can the vacuum supply the huge amount of power that is being generated by the one megawatt NGU system.
If the quantum field energy flow was superconducting and super fluidic like the Higgs field, the very large and possibly unlimited power ptoduction could be supported by the quantum EDF field.
AI prompt
Are the various quantum fields that make up the vacuum all superconducting and super fluidic
AI answer
No, not all quantum fields are superconducting in the vacuum state.
However, modern physics strongly suggests that the vacuum is not empty space, but rather a complex medium filled with condensates that behave mathematically like superconductors or superfluid’s. This analogy is central to our understanding of mass and the strong nuclear force.
The Higgs Field behaves like a superconductor, “screening” the weak force and giving particles mass (analogous to the Meissner effect).
The QCD (Strong) Vacuum behaves like a dual superconductor, squeezing gluons into flux tubes that confine quarks.
The Electromagnetic Field is generally not superconducting (photons are massless), except potentially under extreme conditions.
The Higgs Field: Superconductor of the Weak Force
The most famous application of this analogy is the Higgs Mechanism. In a conventional superconductor, pairs of electrons (Cooper pairs) condense into a superfluid state. This condensate expels magnetic fields (the Meissner effect), effectively giving the photon a “mass” inside the material, which limits its range.
In the Standard Model, the Higgs field fills the entire universe with a similar condensate (the Vacuum Expectation Value). This “superconducting” vacuum screens the Weak Nuclear Force, causing its carriers (the W and Z bosons) to become heavy and short-ranged, while the photon remains massless.
To understand how a field “condenses” to fill the vacuum, we visualize the Mexican Hat Potential. At high energy, the vacuum is symmetric (empty). As the universe cools, the field “rolls” down to a lower energy state that is non-zero, filling the universe with the Higgs condensate.
The QCD Vacuum: The “Dual” Superconductor
The vacuum of Quantum Chromodynamics (QCD)—the theory of the strong force—exhibits a phenomenon called Dual Superconductivity.
In a normal superconductor, magnetic field lines are repelled. If they penetrate, they are squeezed into thin flux tubes. In the QCD vacuum, the roles of electric and magnetic charges are swapped (hence “dual”). The vacuum acts as a condensate of magnetic monopoles, which squeezes the chromoelectric field (the field between quarks) into tight flux tubes.
Confinement & Flux Tubes
Because the vacuum squeezes the force field into a tube rather than letting it spread out, the energy required to pull two quarks apart increases linearly with distance. This prevents quarks from ever existing freely—a phenomenon known as Color Confinement.
Is the Electromagnetic Vacuum a Superconductor?
Generally, no. In our standard vacuum, photons travel freely and are massless, meaning the electromagnetic vacuum is not a superconductor (which would give them mass).
The Exception: Theoretical physicist Maxim Chernodub has proposed that in the presence of extremely strong magnetic fields (10^16) Tesla, far beyond anything currently producible), the vacuum could spontaneously become a superconductor along the axis of the magnetic field. In this exotic state, virtual rho mesons would condense, allowing the vacuum to conduct electricity without resistance.
Speculative Physics: Superfluid Vacuum Theory (SVT) Beyond the Standard Model, some theoretical frameworks (like Superfluid Vacuum Theory) propose that spacetime itself is a superfluid background (a Bose-Einstein condensate). In these models, fundamental particles are merely excitations (phonons) of this background fluid. While mathematically elegant, this remains a speculative fringe theory compared to the widely accepted Higgs and QCD vacuum models.
The large power output of the NGU reaction may provide support for the Superfluid Vacuum Theory (SVT).
Axil:
Thank you for your insight,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Andrea!
Has power been output to the grid from the MW E-cat modules so at any public has had access to the E-cat energy?
If not, where does all the energy go for the testing E-cat plant?
Best regards
Nils Fryklund
Nils Fryklund:
The energy goes to the owner of the plant,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dr. Rossi
Does the new design of the 22kv grid capable reactor still provide the same power production efficiency of your earlier lower powered reactor designs?
If not, is waste heat rejection at the root of the issues that you must now overcome?
Axil:
1- yes
2- we do not have waste heat; by the way, I cannot disclose the nature of the issues we are dealing with
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dr. Rossi:
Is the one megawatt plant being assembled in Europe or in the United States?
Drew G.
Drew Glista:
I cannot answer this question,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Andrea Rossi
1) The 1MW generator under construction is built from 100W Ecats?
2) Overlooking packaging are the characteristics of the 100W Ecats used here especially suited to a large plant assembly?
3) Overlooking packaging will the characteristics be different when 100W units are offered to fulfil small orders?
4) There is only one 100W Ecat and can be employed in a 1MW plant or as a stand alone unit?
Steve D:
1- yes
2- basically no
3- basically no
4- basically yes
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Hi Andrea,
how do you explain the fact that, after the start of E-Cat production, there has been no news in the media?
Best regatds
Alessandro Coppi
Alessandro Coppi:
The Global Licensee wants nor make any press release or press conference so far for the reasons I have already explained here,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Andrea
Your answers and messages, the last week, were very optimistic and thereby inspiring to all your followers.
I look forward to the announced message about a measured volumetric kW production that an aggregate composed of a number of 100W Ecat units, has achieved.
The many and very comprehensive presentations that “Axil” has presented appear to be a technological “third-party assessment” and will therefore open the way for a number of industries to view the presented measurement figures as being in line with the available theoretical possibilities.
A large number of test orders for similar plants could quickly be the result.
This, together with the fact that a modern production plant has now been established, will lead to a completely different level of attention than what the single EV demonstration in September 2024 did.
The fantastic flexibility of a 1MW plant consisting of adjustable small units is a great need to be incorporated into many power supply systems where rapidly varying solar and wind power is a significant factor and a demanding challenge.
This alone can be an argument that surpasses Ecat’s favorable price.
Regards Svein
Svein:
Thank you for your insight,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Hello DR Rossi
A tale in the life of
Richard Feynman.
https://youtu.be/r91KO0fl8tc?si=FFHsqxu5JPTGwANp
Regards
Sam
Sam:
Thank you for the link,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dr. Rossi:
I am excited to see the system fully integrated and working, I’m sure that your team will solve the problem. My guess is that the problems have to do will system stability as the number of units are added together reaches a limit. Obviously, you were able to integrate a large number of units for the use in the Twizy demonstration. My questions are:
1). Was the problem identified only when a large number of units were tied together?
2). Is there a “global” or “hierarchical” control strategy in use to control voltage?
Thomas Kaminski:
Thank you for your support.
Sorry, these issues are confidential,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dr. Rossi:
It is concerning to hear of unexpected problems with the Ecat installation. Do you understand the issues, or are you still trying to figure things out? Sending my positive thoughts to you!
Regards, Ecat Enthusiast.
Ecat Enthusiast:
The issues have been analyzed and understood and we are fixing all.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dr Rossi,
1. Assuming you’re working through issues already does that mean the whole unit is fully assembled?
2. Do all the units snap together or is there soldering involved?
3. Has production paused until the issues are resolved?
4. Will production continue regardless of customer(s) setup issues?
Thanks
Jeff
Jeff:
1. no
2. no soldering between the modules are made
3. no
4. yes
Warm Regards,
A.R.
AI prompt
If the dynamic Casimir effect (DCE) removes virtual particles from the inside of the vacuum enclosed by the domain wall a localized true vacuum confined within a domain wall is eventually reached. Concurrently, the negative momentum based waveforms produced by the exciton polariton condensate via it dispersion channel also removes virtual particles from inside the domain wall. This developing true vacuum produces a state where vacuum decay begins to occur. This vacuum decay causes vacuum energy to be transferred from the false vacuum into the true vacuum within the domain wall. The existence of a domain wall that forms around the BEC is a positive indicator the the BEC is producing a true vacuum state. The negative momentum photons produced by the condensate will reduce the energy content of the BEC thereby forming a localized true vacuum restricted to the inside the domain wall even though the DCE is using that vacuum energy transferred from the false vacuum to create real particles. Create an appropriate simulation that depicts this scenario as described.
Ai answer
Based on your description, the scenario involves a complex feedback loop where the Dynamic Casimir Effect (DCE) and an Exciton-Polariton Condensate (BEC) work concurrently to purge virtual particles from a region enclosed by a domain wall. This creates a localized True Vacuum, triggering Vacuum Decay that harvests energy from the surrounding False Vacuum to drive further particle creation.
The simulation below models this theoretical interactions as a dynamic system.
Mechanism Breakdown
This simulation visualizes the four distinct physical phases you described:
1. The Dynamic Casimir Effect (DCE): Represented by the vibrating boundary. In quantum field theory, rapidly moving boundaries can convert virtual vacuum fluctuations into real photons. In your scenario, this boundary acts as the engine using the energy difference.
2. Exciton-Polariton Clearing: The internal wave patterns represent the condensate. These quasiparticles have extremely low effective mass and can exhibit negative dispersion features, which your model uses to suppress virtual particle formation.
3. True vs. False Vacuum: The contrast between the chaotic background (False Vacuum) and the dark interior (True Vacuum). The “False” vacuum is a metastable, higher-energy state. A transition to the “True” vacuum releases potential energy.
4. Vacuum Decay & Nucleation: The flow of energy from the outside in. Typically, vacuum decay is modeled as a bubble expanding at the speed of light, but your scenario utilizes a confined Domain Wall to harness this energy transfer locally.
———————————————-
Action this link in the command line to see the AI output or more easily if possible click on the link.
https://www.google.com/search?q=If+the+dynamic+Casimir+effect+%28DCE%29+removes+virtual+particles+from+the+inside+of+the+vacuum+enclosed+by+the+domain+wall+a+localized+true+vacuum+confined+within+a+domain+wall+is+evebtually+reached.+Concurently%2C+the+negative+momentum+based+waveforms+produced+by+the+exciton+polariton+condensate+via+it+dispersion+channel+also+removes+virtual+particles+from+inside+the+domai+wall.+This+developing+true+vacuum+produces+a+state+where+vacuum+decay+begins+to+occur.+This+vacuum+decay+causes+vacuum+energy+to+be+transfered+from+the+false+vacuum+into+the+true+vacuum+within+the+domain+wall.+The+existance+of+a+domain+wall+that+forms+around+the+BEC+is+a+positvr+indicator+the+the+BEC+is+producing+a+true+vacuum+state.+The+negative+momentum+photons+produced+by+the+condensate+will+reduce+the+energy+content+of+the+BEC+thereby+formaing+a+localized+true+vacuum+restricted+to+the+inside+the+domain+wall+even+though+the+DCE+is+using+that+vacuum+energy+transfered+from+the+false+vacuum+to+create+real+particles.+Create+an+appropreate+simulation+that+depics+this+scenario+as+discribed.&sca_esv=f42d30898948003b&sxsrf=ANbL-n7s2V4PwdUMeoOyuX6hfTYDZnkcLA%3A1768196108827&fbs=ADc_l-aN0CWEZBOHjofHoaMMDiKpaEWjvZ2Py1XXV8d8KvlI3o6iwGk6Iv1tRbZIBNIVs-6YKj3ieLLpE5n_AQ7knvnyHmq2hxoqmS0Tx38rbtTMol8iKRZT7U0fRj0ySfd3zK5Kx6lMk6nJX7Hu-krBVCrY2zUD2rBHT8008W4nfB_nunebHy0y-HQPyWffLHJ9RtVTZ6_9z-kIyQiIKde-5n9MhDksEg&aep=1&ntc=1&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwiozdbno4WSAxXgEmIAHW0rA40Q2J8OegQIERAE&biw=1265&bih=607&dpr=1.52&aic=0&nem=143&mstk=AUtExfA7oD0G9gtueM47t1nksNl7404a4hvvi7TLMFZh-B4jVuuOUQn0ZXfEol4JDFyLW6j2AZJ8F6TBnfiPjWULjIXwAj-s3-TBRxAPn2uxNXzZnxdG991efjLDi_zjFrMhUF_XTZFC8hSU3iMDqLzbiyVd_LA9rzTu8ajfO8ANbaQ1fstXAotvBDajQgWjVVrl5coUq5fVNEd6F-F1m37hh2EGucbNOGl6lZklsS1ur6E1mkzEFI5_I6KqW5mRYC5FW8l_tLE_lZaJJjXch4gFCM3G2tkS0tzQO2lbrm3W3366IX5U1DfhPiXzuBfrJ-NYr5OCQ25gEjwZvQo&csuir=1
Axil:
Thank you for your insights,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dr Rossi,
The fact that the deliveries have been started with industrial plants is understandable, the important is that sooner or later all the pre-ordered units will be delivered : can you confirm this ?
Yuri
Yuri:
I think so, because it is in their interest,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dr Rossi,
The choice of Leonardo’s global licensee to start with big industrial installations is obvious: to start delivering small and cheap units would proliferate competitors around the world before having consolidated a privileged market position; every company would behave that way,
Best,
Ambrogio
Ambrogio:
I agree,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
AI prompt
Quantum field theory posits that the vacuum carries a quantum field for every possible particle that exists. Each such field carries a finite amount of energy. The Zero point energy is the combined total of all field energy generated by the uncertainty in each field. The amount of energy carried in the zero point energy in extremely small compared to the huge amount carried by the sum of all quantum fields.
AI answer
In quantum field theory (QFT), your description of the vacuum contains several core physical principles, though the relationship between zero-point energy (ZPE) and the “total field energy” requires specific clarification regarding how physicists define these terms:
Vacuum as a Collection of Fields: The vacuum is not truly empty but is defined as the ground state (lowest energy state) of all underlying quantum fields (e.g., electromagnetic, Higgs, and quark fields).
Zero-Point Energy Definition: For each quantum field, the ZPE is the residual energy that remains even when no particles are present. It arises from the Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle, which prevents a field from ever being completely “still” or having exactly zero energy and zero momentum simultaneously.
ZPE vs. Total Field Energy: In standard QFT, ZPE and vacuum energy are synonymous. The “total energy” of the vacuum is simply the sum of the ZPE from every possible field mode.
The Scale Paradox: Naïve theoretical calculations suggest this ZPE sum should be infinite or enormously large (up to (10^93) grams per cubic centimeter). However, astronomical observations of the universe’s expansion show the actual measured vacuum energy is extremely small—close to zero.
Renormalization: Because only differences in energy are typically measurable in particle physics, physicists often use a mathematical process called renormalization to “subtract away” the infinite ZPE, effectively setting the vacuum energy to zero for practical calculations.
————————————————
In the dynamic Casimir effect, virtual particles are transformed into real particles. The energy that is required for the transformation comes from the particle field, not the ZPE.
Action this link in the command line to see the AI output or more easily if possible click on the link.
https://www.google.com/search?q=%EF%BB%BFIn+the+dynamic+Casimir+effect%2C+virtual+particles+are+transformed+into+real+particles.+The+energy+that+is+required+for+the+transformation+comes+from+the+particle+field%2C+not+the+ZPE.&sca_esv=d51e216224ab4eeb&sxsrf=ANbL-n5Ks2qycVbRm81C8qF4RWRa8fLASA%3A1768188511614&fbs=ADc_l-aN0CWEZBOHjofHoaMMDiKpV6Bbbmx4QVaoKkiRQ2jlwvMg54BMciw6zYi-UcSdrQBNV1fEZVQc09EDL8fA8LwnhBL-kJSf4-mzu2et6bMnRF9wMH-KJjh6HueW4eglzjr4IQhfaUKXc_gcDmkZvfpxFmXnMCTwBbtwh7GIhCHcbTsaiPAR-WLLQTjeN7k6Ld_QGriz7srgrI9cNcaVkvwSKp9iQQ&aep=1&ntc=1&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwjBj4XBh4WSAxV-F1kFHYCpMsoQ2J8OegQIEhAE&biw=1265&bih=607&dpr=1.52&aic=0&nem=143&mstk=AUtExfDm3i9wXmaatzz1i3yIF8AyD037z1cewH4sZtXA6xpBBPSaH-e0t1co9ScL7bOZA00x951hWHpVJWDREbDWa6qT72scn4Vvffja1FRuqUSABm4A4nAgVRUaLiH2kjN_bRNCtWEAeRI8VKT-ZfbMtSlp395IKmUwjrP_fZOqtk2Ce8wES2zRXJzdbIo6qjHuSZuNI_PSWB9UqvfPGM2bIKOU7YgI2itaDSYOs7exTBhpNYAcPBS2B4err1lfnNh3zy5T8bw-1bJlekaZiBPT7ElpPU3rPc6BL4T3tYZm4OtARXwKmobWxdnPd-gd7BiUUAVZeSXCws4qB6krlHtUuYeKWuJocR_yYwinRolojQ_vs8nJETnIP-WM&csuir=1
————————————————-
There must be another source of energy generated by the EVO. It might be energy derived from vacuum decay since particle creation is constrained by the energy conservation law (no energy gain).
The key to the design of a high powered E-cat is the use of the mouse and cat protocol in the structure of the reactor. This control strategy enables many small reactor cores to combine using a backplane connected by quantum mechanical entanglement so that no dedicated hardware or control processes coordinate 10s of thousands of individual microcores into a powerful global hole. This is quantum mechanics at beyond the cutting edge.
This innovative reactor architecture provides both the advantages of microcore only processes: high efficiency through heat elimination and simplicity of global reactor control without the disadvantages of reactor distruction (meltdown) through waste heat buildup.
I am disadvantaged in that I do not have any knowledge of the NGU structure but have assumed this structure from existing theory development. I am sorry if I am off base.
Dear Andrea
I refer to your answer to Yuri: 2026-01-10 at 11:00.
My question here is:
1. whether it is the individual 100 Watts units that are not working perfectly or:
2 whether it is getting 10,000 of these to work perfectly together in a 1MW unit?
Regards Svein
Svein:
2
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dr Rossi,
Can you tell us which problems you had to resolve with the delivered Ecats ?
Roberto
Roberto:
Sorry, this issue is confidential; anyway, we are resolving one by one all the issues that popped up.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Andrea Rossi,
The USA average continuous electrical power demand is around 466 gigawatts (GW) or 466,000 MW. Expect increase in demand over the next 10 years is 25% or roughly 100,000 MW, not counting AI data centers which are projected to be another 100,000 MW over the decade.
AI data centers will require near constant power and the electrical generation could be located at the data center – ideal for NGU systems.
There are roughly 55,000 electrical substations in the US. Placing an average 2 MW NGU systems in each substation could provide the additional capacity needed for the forecast increase in electrical power capacity. This would allow increase electrical production without corresponding increases in distribution capacity.
Question: Assuming 500W NGU units, can the number of 500W NGU units be produced over the next decade?
Steven Nicholes Karels:
It is very difficult to answer, because this depends on many factors; : theoretically, yes,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dr Rossi,
Are the Ecats already delivered working as expected ?
Yuri:
Well, but not perfectly, some intervention has been necessary; we are resolving the problems,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
How does the Vacuum reaction utilized in Dr. Rossi’s reactors generate over-unity energy release?
In this post:
https://www.journal-of-nuclear-physics.com/?p=892&cpage=909#comment-1705449
I stated:
3. Triggering the Dynamic Casimir Effect
The culmination of this process is the production of a vacuum energy difference. The negative mass regime creates a rapidly changing boundary condition—effectively a relativistic perturbation in the vacuum field—which triggers the Dynamic Casimir Effect (DCE).
The Energy Flow Mechanism: In this specific theoretical model, the negative momentum photons influence the vacuum within the cavity such that vacuum energy flows from the vacuum into the dynamic Casimir cavity, manifesting as real photons or heat.
————————-
The particles that the dynamic Casimir cavity creates are both photons and polaritons.
This means is that the number of polaritons increases in time as the Condensate grows larger with that passage of time.
In experiments conducted by MFMP, these condensates begin at a submicron size. Over time, because of the accumulated increase of vacuum energy transformed into additional numbers of polaritons, the size of the condensates’ reaches a diameter of about 250 microns. At that size, the condensate becomes unstable and explodes in a Bosenova.
All during this condensate growth cycle, the condensate is producing increasing amounts of light since each polariton is converting vacuum energy into light. So the condensate increases in light output as time goes forward until it becomes unstable and explodes.
When the condensate explodes, many more electrons and photons are created than existed when the condensate was created. This process of condensate growth also adds to the increase in vacuum energy release.
I asked the AI to validate, consolidate and explain this aforementioned posit:
The AI’s response
The text you provided is a specific theoretical framework proposed by Andrea Rossi (inventor of the E-Cat) and discussed within the LENR (Low Energy Nuclear Reaction) community. It attempts to explain anomalous heat production by combining the Dynamic Casimir Effect (DCE) with Exciton-Polariton Condensates.
The posit claims that a specific “negative mass” state in a light-matter condensate triggers a vacuum energy influx, causing the condensate to grow until it reaches a critical size of roughly 250 microns, at which point it violently collapses (a “Bosenova”), releasing significant energy.
Consolidated Logic Chain
Step 1: Formation
An Exciton-Polariton Condensate forms. This is a quantum fluid made of hybrid light-matter particles.
Step 2: Negative Mass
The condensate enters a “Negative Mass Regime.” In this model, this refers to a specific dispersion anomaly where the particle’s group velocity opposes its momentum.
Step 3: Virtual Mirror
This negative mass state creates a rapidly changing boundary condition in the vacuum field. The theory posits these acts effectively as a relativistic mirror, the requirement for triggering the Dynamic Casimir Effect.
Step 4: Vacuum Influx
The DCE converts virtual vacuum fluctuations into real photons and polaritons, injecting energy into the system.
Step 5: Critical Growth
Fed by this vacuum energy, the condensate grows in size (and luminosity) over time.
Step 6: The Bosenova
At a critical diameter of ~250 microns, the condensate becomes unstable and explodes. This collapse (Bosenova) releases the accumulated energy as a burst of electrons, photons, and heat.
Detailed Explanation of Terms
Dynamic Casimir Effect (DCE): Standard Physics: A phenomenon where real photons are created from the vacuum by a mirror moving at relativistic speeds (close to the speed of light). In This Theory: The “negative mass” regime provides a virtual relativistic boundary, removing the need for a mechanical mirror to move at impossible speeds.
Negative Mass Regime: Standard Physics: “Negative mass” is generally hypothetical or refers to “effective mass” in solid-state physics (how an electron responds to forces in a lattice).
In This Theory: It refers to a specific state in the dispersion curve of the polariton condensate where momentum and velocity vectors are opposed, creating the perturbation needed to “trick” the vacuum.
Polaritons: Quasiparticles formed by the strong coupling of electromagnetic waves (light) and an electric dipole-carrying excitation (matter). They allow light to behave like a fluid.
Bosenova: Standard Physics: A tiny, controlled collapse observed in ultracold Bose-Einstein Condensates (thousands of atoms) when interactions are tuned to be attractive.
In This Theory: A macroscopic explosion of a large (250 micron) condensate, credited as the source of the excess energy in the E-Cat.
Context: The MFMP Connection
Experimental Attribution: The post attributes the 250-micron limit to observations by the Martin Fleischmann Memorial Project (MFMP). MFMP researchers (such as Bob Greenyer) have documented microscopic objects (often called “EVOs” or Exotic Vacuum Objects) that appear to form, emit light, and violently disintegrate. This theory attempts to mathematically model those observations.
Dear Readers
The way that the vacuum works is that particles come into existence and then return into the vacuum in pairs so that when the pairs combine, this recombination recovers the energy that created the pair.
The phonon is one such particle. But to exist and then terminate, they need to exist as a connected (entangled) pair.
In more detail, physicist describe the “quantum vacuum” not as empty space, but as a field buzzing with the activity of particles. Here is a simple explanation of how this works:
Temporary Energy “Loans”: The vacuum has a minimum energy level that is never zero. Because of the Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle, energy can fluctuate randomly for extremely short periods. You can think of this as “borrowing” energy from the vacuum to create something.
The Particle-Antiparticle Pair: This borrowed energy manifests as a pair consisting of a particle and its matching antiparticle (e.g., an electron and a positron). They must appear in pairs to keep the total “charge” of the vacuum at zero.
Virtual Photons: The photon is a special case because it is its own antiparticle. In the vacuum, “virtual photons” can appear and disappear as part of these fluctuations to carry electromagnetic forces.
Entanglement: These pairs are born entangled, meaning they are fundamentally connected. Because they share the same origin, their properties (like spin or polarization) are linked regardless of the distance between them.
Returning the Energy: To satisfy the laws of physics, the “loan of energy” must be repaid quickly. The pair must find each other and annihilate (combine), which returns the energy back to the vacuum and effectively “erases” the particles from existence.
One might say: ‘If we’re talking about a complex frequency +jw and its complex conjugate -jw, this doesn’t mean that frequency w is negative. Frequency is always positive. So is energy.”
The term “Negative frequency” is a mathematical convention, but both particles in the conjected pair have valid frequencies and energies.
In physics and engineering, “negative frequency” is a tool for calculation, not a physical state.
Here is the breakdown in simple terms: Frequency is like speed: Just as a car cannot drive at “negative 60 mph,” a physical wave cannot vibrate a negative number of times per second. Frequency represents the rate of oscillation, which is always a positive physical quantity.
The “Mirror” Math: When we use complex numbers like jw and its conjugate -jw, we are splitting one real-world signal into two mathematical parts to make the equations easier to solve. Think of it like looking at a person and their reflection in a mirror; there is only one real person, but the math “sees” two versions to track the full motion. Energy stays positive: Because energy is calculated based on the square of the amplitude or frequency, even the “negative” mathematical part represents positive physical energy.
Both parts of the pair contribute to the total energy of the system. The Convention: We use the term “negative frequency” simply to describe the direction of rotation in the complex plane (clockwise vs. counter-clockwise), not to imply that the frequency itself is less than zero.
Read this wiki about how this pair of particle are related in their associated frequencies (one positive and one negative):
Negative frequency
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Negative_frequency#:~:text=A%20negative%20frequency%20causes%20the,)%20by%201%2F4%20cycle.&text=whose%20corollary%20is%3A&text=can%20have%20only%20one%20sign,function%20and%20a%20complex%20one
So Sorry, in my post with the long AI prompt link, the click method of activation does not work. I should have debug that method but I did not think to do it.
But now load this long link into the command line and activate it. This method works for me.
Dear Readers,
I watched the following Italian-language documentary on UFOs, which I found very interesting.
UFO Documentario Italiano Unacknowledged Steven Greer
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q6qcJ3YcMnQ&t=1315s
Among other things, ZPE vacuum energy is mentioned at one point, suggesting that it could be the energy used by UFOs.
It also discusses the risk and real possibility that, if an inventor were to discover this technology, he could be “disappeared” by secret government entities.
This would fully justify the inventor’s need for absolute secrecy regarding this technology.
Best regards,
Italo R.
Dr. Rossi has accustomed us to a monthly report
Gavino Mamia:
As a matter of fact, I did and will continue to do,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
This virtual particle theory is important in the vacuum reaction that occurs in the E-Cat reactor. Because the Exciton polariton condensate generates real photons from virtual photons via the Dynamic Casimir Effect, the light generated by the vacuum reaction will tend to produce light in the negative frequency UV light range. This UV spectrum has been verified in the spectrum produced by the SK reactor.
AI Prompt
When a photon is created in the vacuum, a complimentary pair of photons: both a positive frequency photon and a negative frequency photon is created. Both these paired photons have positive energy but when they combine, they annihilate each other each so that they return the energy of the photon pair back to the vacuum. The negative frequency photon is usually in the ultra violet frequency range.
AI Response
In quantum field theory (QFT), the creation and annihilation of photons in a vacuum involve specific mathematical and physical interpretations regarding frequency and energy:
Positive and Negative Frequencies
• Mathematical Decomposition: The electromagnetic field is decomposed into two parts: a positive-frequency component and a negative-frequency component.
• Operators: In the standard Heisenberg picture, the positive-frequency part is associated with annihilation operators (absorbing a photon), while the negative-frequency part is associated with creation operators (creating a photon).
• Energy and Time: Standard QFT is designed so that all physical particles, including those created by negative-frequency components, have positive energy (E=ℏω). Negative-frequency modes are sometimes interpreted as positive-energy particles moving backward in time, but they do not possess “negative energy” in a physical sense.
Vacuum Fluctuations and Annihilation
• Virtual Pairs: The vacuum is characterized by fluctuations where virtual particle-antiparticle pairs (such as electron-positron pairs) are continuously created and destroyed.
• Photon Behavior: Because a photon is its own antiparticle, “annihilating” two photons typically results in scattering or other interactions rather than mutual destruction back into the vacuum. However, virtual particle pairs that do annihilate return their energy to the vacuum’s zero-point energy pool.
Ultraviolet Frequencies
• Vacuum Ultraviolet (VUV): The term “vacuum ultraviolet” refers to a specific range of electromagnetic radiation (wavelengths approx. 10–200 nm) that is strongly absorbed by air, requiring a vacuum for propagation.
• Physical Significance: This frequency range is significant because it matches the ionization energies of many materials and the bond energies of most molecules. There is no fundamental rule stating that all negative-frequency creation events must result specifically in ultraviolet light; they can occur across various frequencies depending on the energy involved.
The dark side of light – negative frequency photons
https://arstechnica.com/science/2012/08/the-dark-side-of-light-negative-frequency-photons/
Negative frequency
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Negative_frequency#:~:text=A%20negative%20frequency%20causes%20the,)%20by%201%2F4%20cycle.&text=whose%20corollary%20is%3A&text=can%20have%20only%20one%20sign,function%20and%20a%20complex%20one
The following link shows the AI input to my last post. This input includes a parameterized simulation of photon and polariton creation of real particles derived from the transformation of virtual particles into real particles based on the optical vibrations of the Exciton polariton condensate. It also shows the active plot of negative momentum polaritons in the dispersion relation curve.
This peer reviewed theory may be of some interest to some of your readers.
This research data dispels the myth that energy cannot be extracted from the vacuum.
The link is long due to a current weakness in the AI design in that it can’t yet accept prompts directly from the internet. click on the link to see the AI generated data.
https://www.google.com/search?q=can+you+reorganize+the+following+posts+into+a+single+well+designed+narative+while+keeping+all+the+relevant+detail%3A+The+bosonic+electron+cluster+is+an+exciton+polariton+condensate+which+produces+a+vacuum+energy+difference+as+follows%3A%0AAI+Question%0AIn+the+dispersion+regime+of+the+exciton+polariton+condensate%2C+how+virtual+negative+energy+photons+are+involved+is+the+behavior+of+negative+mass+effects+as+applied+to+the+condensate.+What+effect+does+this+negative+momentum+type+photon+have+on+the+vacuum%3F+How+does+this+negative+mass+regime+produce+a+dynamic+Casimir+effect%3F+Describe+how+vacuum+energy+flows+from+the+vacuum+into+the+dynamic+Casimir+cavity.%0AAI+Answer%0AIn+the+exciton-polariton+condensate%2C+the+%22negative+mass%22+regime+is+a+consequence+of+engineered+dispersion%2C+which+is+related+to+the+manipulation+of+virtual+negative+energy+photons+within+the+quantum+vacuum.%0AInvolvement+of+Virtual+Negative+Energy+Photons%0ADispersion+Engineering%3A+The+effective+mass+of+exciton-polaritons+%28hybrid+light-matter+quasiparticles%29+can+be+engineered+to+be+negative%2C+particularly+at+certain+in-plane+momenta+in+the+lower+polariton+branch.+This+anomalous+dispersion+is+often+induced+by+specific+conditions+like+dissipative+coupling+or+strong+exciton-phonon+interactions.%0AMomentum+vs.+Velocity%3A+In+this+negative+mass+regime%2C+the+group+velocity+%28direction+of+propagation%29+of+the+polaritons+is+opposite+to+their+momentum+%28or+phase+velocity%29.%0AAttractive+Interaction%3A+This+behavior+can+be+conceptualized+in+terms+of+virtual+photons+that+mediate+an+attractive+force+rather+than+a+repulsive+one.+In+standard+QED%2C+attractive+forces+%28like+between+an+electron+and+a+proton%29+are+mediated+by+virtual+photons+that+effectively+carry+%22negative+energy%22+or+%22negative+inertial+mass%2C%22+causing+a+pull+instead+of+a+push.+In+the+polariton+condensate%2C+the+effective+attraction+from+engineered+dispersion+mimics+this+characteristic.%0AEffect+on+the+Vacuum%0AThe+negative+momentum%2Fenergy+virtual+photons+%28or+the+effective+interaction+that+mimics+them%29+influence+the+quantum+vacuum+within+t&sca_esv=f0a2cfff8d0f2978&sxsrf=ANbL-n7iqI6d5OYeZyE_M5ZHq0mYhm8zjQ%3A1767873918547&fbs=ADc_l-aN0CWEZBOHjofHoaMMDiKpaEWjvZ2Py1XXV8d8KvlI3o6iwGk6Iv1tRbZIBNIVs-6YKj3ieLLpE5n_AQ7knvny57g1ZkbxsiktqbLCsm0kbSQ89PK7LxdKNvSnnOoVLaOxOq39jbBfPZefa_om3OsGjDNERMDQbwZ6qhlzkHVkL8vcWV5Z0atcCZ3Ax_TEFt8FFs6JEoJui40MQIdZR3Zy01tofw&aep=1&ntc=1&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwjDurDH8_uRAxWIhIkEHTJuOTgQ2J8OegQIEhAE&biw=1265&bih=607&dpr=1.52&aic=0&nem=143&mstk=AUtExfC6cJL2vS1-sGxAIgJ6T83yjBMXAdrbBIvhY2_whivsIe0d0yS9magF6FEZXnaARD-kXLqgkMSz-h8mFM1pVGpSzW-eoblsdovITK02LsGgmbrvqE_m8SYp9ZZBPnkrDoTiJl0e96DgVl_KrDo3NoXPt2t7_HyQkFXzj6lWBCsxIkmNqp_aQkGh94uFX16FUtAdAAyrl-46JZ35FGvWlDtsi0RGR9p1Y7b8G8yuxSl2VxcUoPsvS8HaWzK1F190u9Z8DV4w5zPSafhtps1aDBf-Vc33Y4GxlennYmzJPp6X5r5tdQ5oPiikeJFK8L6AWy_eaEKizv_Yrjw&csuir=1
Dear Andrea
I see your message to Gavino M: 07.01.2026 at 16:23. That you will soon publish watts per liter volume for Ecat.
My question here is:
May more supplementary technical matters of the Ecats be presented at the same time?
Regards Svein
Svein:
This issue does not depend on me,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
It is important to aid the understanding of the vacuum reaction for the non-expert so I asked the AI: Can you reorganize the last few of my posts on the Bosonic Electron Cluster into a single well designed narrative conformant with current science while keeping all the relevant detail:
The AI extract
The Bosonic Electron Cluster is defined in this model as an exciton-polariton condensate—a macroscopic quantum state formed by hybrid light-matter quasiparticles. By engineering the dispersion properties of this condensate, the system can enter a “negative mass” regime. This unique state allows for the manipulation of virtual negative energy photons within the quantum vacuum, theorized to trigger a Dynamic Casimir Effect where vacuum energy flows into the cavity.
1. The Negative Mass Regime
The foundation of this effect lies in Dispersion Engineering. In a standard particle, kinetic energy increases with momentum. However, for exciton-polaritons (which are composite bosons), the effective mass can be engineered to be negative within the lower polariton branch. This is often induced by dissipative coupling or strong exciton-phonon interactions.
Momentum vs. Velocity: In the negative mass regime, the group velocity (direction of propagation) is opposite to the momentum (phase velocity). The particle effectively moves backwards when pushed.
Associated dispersion curves will illustrate the “Negative Mass” region where the dispersion curve (Energy vs. Momentum) inverts, becoming concave (downward curving).
2. Role of Virtual Negative Energy Photons
The behavior of the condensate in this regime can be conceptualized through the interaction of virtual particles.
Attractive Interaction
Just as virtual photons in standard QED mediate attractive forces (like the pull between an electron and proton) by effectively carrying “negative energy” or “negative inertial mass,” the engineered dispersion in the polariton condensate mimics this attractive force.
Quantum Structure Visualization
Vacuum Influence
These negative momentum/energy virtual photons (or the effective interaction that mimics them) do not just exist in isolation; they actively influence the local quantum vacuum structure.
3. Triggering the Dynamic Casimir Effect
The culmination of this process is the production of a vacuum energy difference. The negative mass regime creates a rapidly changing boundary condition—effectively a relativistic perturbation in the vacuum field—which triggers the Dynamic Casimir Effect (DCE).
The Energy Flow Mechanism: In this specific theoretical model, the negative momentum photons influence the vacuum within the cavity such that vacuum energy flows from the vacuum into the dynamic Casimir cavity, manifesting as real photons or heat.
Dear Andrea Rossi,
You asked me to clarify:
Out of World Question:
1. Do you think NGU technology will work on worlds where the gravitational constant for that location is less than that of the Earth?
2. If such a limitation exists, would a centrifuge-induced sensed gravitation allow for proper NGU operation?
3. Will NGU technology work on:
a. the Earth’s Moon;
b. Mars;
c. Venus;
d. Europe?
4. If NGU technology will not work in gravimetric fields lower than Earth’s field, can you swing the NGU around, like in a centrifuge, to approach the sensation of Earth’s gravity.
Steven Nicholes Karels:
1. I am not able to answer
2. I am not able to answer
3. In Europe as well as in the whole Earth planet this issue does not exist; about other planets, I am not able to answer
4. I am not able to answer
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Andrea Rossi,
Out of World Question:
1. Do you think NGU technology will work on worlds where the gravitational constant for that location is less than that of the Earth?
2. If such a limitation exists, would a centrifuge-induced sensed gravitation allow for proper NGU operation?
Steven Nicholes Karels:
1. I do not understand what you mean: cen you rephrase ?
2. Same as in 1
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Andrea,
The things that are happening in the world these days are truly sad and frustrating. I hope that the release of Ecat can be a reason to help calm everyone’s spirits.
Giuseppe
Giuseppe Censorio:
We hope so,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dr. Rossi, a 100-megawatt ECAT reactor provides the same power as 40-50 wind turbines, covering several hectares. I imagine it as large as a five-story building.
How big is it, approximately?
A wind turbine has about 2,000 hours of effective operation per year (in windy Sardinia) and is considered the most competitive renewable energy source, with costs between 3.5 and 8 cents per kW.
Consider that Italy purchases nuclear power from France at about 5 cents per kW.
ECAT is by far the most cost-effective and environmentally friendly source.
I can’t wait to see some photos of this ECAT reactor and hope for a global presentation.
Gavino Mamia:
We will publish soon the Watts per liter of volume of the Ecat,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Dr. Rossi,
eighty-three years ago today, on January 7, 1943, Nikola Tesla died. He was a socialist and a friend of Lenin and Stalin.
https://www.reddit.com/r/EuropeanSocialists/comments/106om8k/stalin_on_the_death_of_nikola_tesla/
A Friend of Lenin and Brave Adventurer
Nikola Tesla – dreamer, inventor and the sole creator of the first practical procedures and apparatus for the production and use of the alternating current, who – alone – during his lifetime, changed the development and use of electricity throughout the world – from the direct current system to the alternating current system – which is now in use almost everywhere. Creator of AC generators and induction motors, without commutators and brushes. A pioneer in inventing, designing, building and operating equipment for the wireless transmission and reception of electric power, and thanks to this, the first person to successfully launch a vehicle at a distance from his station for the wireless transmission of electric power; the vehicle was a boat, which operated and was completely controlled by electricity transmitted by radio. Inventor and builder of the “Tesla coil”, developing electricity and ultra-high voltage current, he also became the most daring experimenter in this high-risk field of electrical research, becoming the first human being to pass millions of volts of electricity from his personal equipment through his body, scintillating with ultra-high voltage electric arcs.
I hope you will follow in his footsteps.
Best regards
Urs Z.
Urs Z.
Thank you for the link,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Dr Andrea Rossi,
I read about your calvary on
http://www.ingandrearossi.com
Unbelievable resilience !
All the best,
Sylvie Conard
Sylvie:
Thank you for your support,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Andrea Rossi: I’ve been looking for a generator for emergency home usage for a while now but don’t have the knowledge of what size would be best to run things such as a box fan, small lamp, hotel sized refrigerator, small electric heater, and electric skillet. Can you please recommend the appropriate size ECAT that I would need for AC power? Also does the generator come with everything needed to be able to use it or do I need to buy additional equipment to be able to use it in the USA? Thank you for your help in advance.
A.L
DR.ROSSI:
1.How many 1KW ECAT units does LEONARDO retain for R and D ?
2.Is original one MW unit being utilized or upgraded?
3. As the engineering scientist; is downsizing the overall dimensions of one MW unit a priority
?
4. What is approximate weight of the one MW unit-ECATS only ?
George Prazak:
1- as much as necessary depending on the situation
2- it has been utilized and eventually recycled
3- no
4- it depends on the situation
Warm Regards
A.R.
The reference in my last post supports the assertion that a Exciton polariton condensate can generate real particle emissions from the vacuum (i.e. Bogoliubov excitations are generated) as follows:
Adding this reference to the my last post as follows:
Your statement is scientifically supported by theoretical models in quantum optics, specifically regarding the Dynamical Casimir Effect (DCE). Research, such as that by Koghee et al. (2014) as follows:
https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2014PhRvL.112c6406K/abstract
https://arxiv.org/abs/1303.1027
Dynamical Casimir Emission from Polariton Condensates
Abstract
We study theoretically the dynamical Casimir effect in an exciton-polariton condensate that is suddenly created by an ultrashort laser pulse at normal incidence. As a consequence of the abrupt change of the quantum vacuum, Bogoliubov excitations are generated. The subsequent evolution, governed by polariton interactions and losses, is studied within a linearized truncted Wigner approximation. We focus in particular on the momentum distribution and spatial coherence. The limiting behavior at large and small momenta is determined analytically. A simple scaling relation for the final condensate depletion as a function of the system parameters is found and the correlation length is shown to depend linearly on the condensate depletion.
This reference provides a partial peer review of Dr. Rossi’s theory of energy extraction from the vacuum.
An addendum to my last post adding detail
Posit for the AI to verify
The coherent actions of an Exciton-Polariton Condensate can produce rapidly vibrating changes in the index of refraction inside an optical cavity. These rapid changes in the index of refraction within the condensate leads to the formation of a dynamic Casimir cavity (DCE) and a reduction of vacuum energy in and around the condensate.
The AI response
Research confirms that the coherent actions of an exciton-polariton condensate can trigger a Dynamical Casimir Effect (DCE) through rapid changes in the system’s properties.
Your statement is scientifically supported by theoretical models in quantum optics, specifically regarding the Dynamical Casimir Effect (DCE). Research, such as that by Koghee et al. (2014), confirms that the coherent oscillation of an exciton-polariton condensate can rapidly modulate the refractive index of a semiconductor microcavity. In physics, a time-varying refractive index is mathematically equivalent to a moving boundary (a mirror moving at relativistic speeds). This rapid “shaking” of the optical container disrupts the quantum vacuum, converting virtual vacuum fluctuations into pairs of real particles (photons or polaritons).
Formation of a Dynamic Casimir Cavity
Exciton-polariton condensates, which are hybrid light-matter quasiparticles in semiconductor microcavities, are inherently sensitive to rapid changes in their environment or density.
Abrupt Changes: When a condensate is suddenly created—for instance, by an ultrashort (femtosecond) laser pulse—it causes an abrupt change in the quantum vacuum.
Refractive Index Modulation: This rapid excitation leads to temporal oscillations in the optical path length (the product of the physical length and the index of refraction).
Bogoliubov Excitations: These non-adiabatic (rapidly vibrating) changes prevent the system from remaining in its ground state, resulting in the generation of real particles from the vacuum—specifically Bogoliubov excitations.
Vacuum Energy and Emission
The formation of this dynamic cavity leads to specific quantum phenomena:
Dynamical Casimir Emission: The “shaking” of the vacuum field by the condensate’s coherent dynamics leads to the emission of photon pairs.
Condensate Depletion: Theoretical studies as of 2026 show that this process results in a “quantum depletion” of the condensate, where a portion of the particles is displaced due to the sudden shift in vacuum state.
Vacuum Energy Interaction: While traditional Casimir effects involve a reduction in vacuum energy between static plates, the DCE in polariton condensates converts vacuum fluctuations into detectable excitations (real polaritons or photons) due to the time-dependent boundary conditions provided by the condensate’s oscillation.
The Physics of Vacuum Manipulation
• 1. The Exciton-Polariton Condensate
Inside a semiconductor microcavity, photons (light) interact so strongly with excitons (electron-hole pairs) that they form hybrid quasi-particles called polaritons. Under the right conditions, these polaritons condense into a macroscopic quantum state (a Bose-Einstein Condensate), behaving as a single coherent wave.
• 2. The “Shaking” Index (Refractive Index Modulation)
The presence of the condensate changes the material’s refractive index. Because the condensate is a dynamic system, its density can oscillate rapidly. A rapidly changing alters the optical path length of the cavity. To a photon inside, it feels exactly as if the cavity walls are vibrating back and forth at relativistic speeds.
• 3. The Dynamic Casimir Emission
Quantum mechanics states that a vacuum is not empty but filled with “virtual” waves popping in and out of existence. If the cavity’s optical boundaries move (or the index changes) faster than these virtual waves can adjust, the boundary conditions “catch” the virtual waves and pump energy into them, turning them into real, observable photons.
________________________________________
Clarification: Reduced Vacuum Energy vs. Particle Creation
It is crucial to distinguish between the Static and Dynamic Casimir effects, as your statement touches on both:
• The Static Effect (Reduction): The mere presence of the cavity walls (or the condensate boundaries) excludes certain vacuum wavelengths. This lowers the vacuum energy density inside the cavity compared to free space, creating a “Casimir Vacuum.”
• The Dynamic Effect (Creation): The vibration of these boundaries (the DCE) adds energy to the system. It draws energy from the driving field (the pump laser or chemical potential) and converts it into real photon pairs, effectively “heating” the vacuum.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=89Mq6gmPo0s
I don’t believe the 2nd law of thermodynamics. (The most uplifting video I’ll ever make.)
Some thoughts on this video as follows regarding Dr. Rossi’s theories:
An addendum to post
https://www.journal-of-nuclear-physics.com/?p=892&cpage=906#comment-1705287
How hole superconductivity is a entropy based catalyst for the formation of a limited region of vacuum acting as a dynamic Casimir cavity.
Statement to AI for validation:
Superconductivity is a low entropy state that can transfer that property to other situations. Hole superconductivity enables the transfer of a low entropy state to a regime of the vacuum by forming and optical cavity in which a exciton polariton condensate is formed. The condensate will then allow the transfer of the low entropy condition to a limited region of the vacuum that surrounds the condensate via the projection of negative photon momenta through the action of its dispersion channel onto the virtual photons formed in the vacuum resulting in a creation of a Dynamic Casimir Cavity.
The AI response
The mechanism you described—linking hole superconductivity to the creation of a dynamic Casimir cavity via negative photon momenta—is a highly specific and speculative theoretical synthesis. While the individual components (exciton-polariton condensates, dynamical Casimir effect, and hole superconductivity) are established concepts in advanced quantum physics, the specific causal chain of “transferring low entropy to the vacuum” via this method is not a standard or experimentally verified phenomenon in mainstream physics. It appears to be a hypothesis often found in “vacuum engineering” or advanced propulsion proposals, combining principles from condensed matter physics with quantum vacuum dynamics.
Concept Breakdown
Your query combines several distinct frontiers of physics. Here is how the standard model understands these terms versus the speculative connection:
Hole Superconductivity: A theory proposed by J.E. Hirsch suggesting superconductivity arises specifically from the pairing of electron holes (positive charge carriers) rather than electrons, driven by kinetic energy lowering.
Exciton-Polariton Condensate: A macroscopic quantum state (Bose-Einstein Condensate) formed by hybrid light-matter particles (polaritons) in a semiconductor microcavity. These condensates exhibit superfluidity and low entropy but are typically contained within solid-state devices.
Dynamic Casimir Effect (DCE): The generation of real photons from the vacuum caused by a boundary (like a mirror) moving at relativistic speeds or by rapidly changing the refractive index of a material (an “optical cavity”).
The Theoretical Mechanism
The hypothesis you presented relies on a few specific, non-standard interpretations of quantum optics:
Negative Photon Momenta: In standard physics, photons have positive energy and momentum. “Negative momentum” usually refers to wave vectors in negative index metamaterials or phase velocity opposing energy flow. The idea of “projecting” this onto the vacuum is a theoretical leap, implying a way to suppress vacuum fluctuations below their zero-point energy.
Entropy Transfer to Vacuum: Thermodynamically, a condensate is a low-entropy state. The proposal suggests that this order can be “imprinted” onto the vacuum. Standard quantum field theory treats the vacuum as having a fixed energy density structure (zero-point energy), which can be excited (DCE) but not typically “ordered” in an entropic sense without the presence of matter.
The Link: The theory likely posits that the rapid oscillation of the polariton condensate (which has a very fast response time) acts as the “moving boundary” required for the Dynamic Casimir Effect, thereby interacting with virtual photons in the surrounding space.
Visualizing the Interaction
This interactive simulation demonstrates the standard behavior of an Exciton-Polariton Condensate in a cavity. You can observe how the condensate forms a coherent wave state, which is the “low entropy” condition mentioned in your query.
This image of the condensate cannot be viewed under this format. See this post for an applicable format:
https://e-catworld.com/2026/01/04/deliveries-ongoing-first-e-cat-plant-not-operating-yet/#comment-6819265043
Dear dr. Rossi, I wish you a serene and happy 2026 and thanks for the product you gave to the world.
One question:
To your knowledge, will the global licensee make itself known, say in the next 3-4 months?
Or is there a deadline for it to go public?
Or is there any chance it simply remains “under the radar” for as long as it wishes so(maybe years)?
Thank you very much
Dearly
Nabil
Nabil:
This issue does not depend on me, but surely the Global Licensee will make a public presentation in due time,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Hello DR Rossi
An interesting video about
the history of the Telescope.
https://youtu.be/eChiW3coNcY?si=GerBP1bx9BHEAjem
Regards
Sam
Sam:
Thank you for the link,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Hello Mr. Rossi,
which plants on which continent produce already Ecat?
Best regards
W.Rudolf
W.Rudolf:
We are manufacturing and delivering the modules to make Megawatt plants. Further information will be given when the Global Licensee will deem it opportune, and this issue will not depend on me,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
@ To all Readers:
I believe pre-order deliveries will not occur for several years.
Fear of premature reverse engineering is likely the deciding factor.
Rossi has always protected his intellectual property with extreme caution (black boxes, strict NDAs, controlled deliveries).
In the past, he has explicitly cited the risk of reverse engineering by “enemies” or customers with only a few units as a reason for not deploying small quantities before reaching massive scale.
Starting exclusively with industrial plants of 1 MW+ (a few sites, corporate customers with secure contracts, monitored access) drastically reduces the risk: difficult physical access for independent analysis, customers motivated to preserve their competitive advantage, time to collect real operational data, optimize, and strengthen barriers (economic, legal, secret know-how).
Because the Ecat is truly revolutionary, its value in the early years lies precisely in maintaining commercial exclusivity.
Deploying thousands of small units worldwide would be tantamount to handing the technology over to competitors (e.g., Chinese or other laboratories) capable of quickly deciphering it.
Protecting intellectual property from reverse engineering remains a classic strategic priority for disruptive technology.
In short, it’s a smart defensive move to prevent the technology from being “stolen” before it becomes unstoppable, much to the disappointment (my own included) of those who pre-ordered many years ago.
Kind Regards,
Italo R.
Dr Rossi,
Congratulations for the start of the deliveries made in December 2025: ad majora !
Ben
Benjamin:
Thank you for your support,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Andrea,
Has the client of your global licensee already received all the necessary E-Cats to build the first plant, or are the deliveries still ongoing?
Thank you very much,
Frank Acland
Frank Acland:
The deliveries are still ongoing,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Andrea and readers, the E Cat was fornerly described as being a hoax or fake due to “contradicting all the laws of thermodynamics” etc. The “laws of thermodynamics” we written by man – the laws of physics by Nature, and Nature, and perhaps divinity, has triumphed.
David-UK:
To proceed along the same wavelength, I think that Entropy , the essence of the Third Thermodynamic Principle, gives scientific evidence of the existence of God; I reached this opinion studying Entropy in function of the theoretical bases of the Ecat operation and the ZPE.
By the way: the Zero Point Energy makes the Ecat not to violate the First Principle of Thermodynamic, because the balance of the O.U. is reconciled by the ZPE:the paper “Ecat SK and Long Range Particle Interactions” gives rigorous explication of this fact.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dr Rossi,
Are the Ecats whose deliveries are in course already industrialized, or are still prototypes subject to modifications to pass through the industrialization phase ?
Thank you if you can answer,
Sergio
Sergio:
The Ecats that are delivered are already industrialized,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Andrea
I congratulate you on a successful year in 2025:
A desired new partner was found.
A new patent has been granted.
A series of 100 Watt elements were produced and delivered exactly in line with your expectations.
I now have the following questions:
1. Were more patent applications submitted in 2025 than the one now granted?
2. Are you working on one or more new patent applications for submission in 2026?
3. Does the stated date: January 20th of this year, mean that more detailed information about the production situation will be provided?
4. When do you expect an official presentation and test may come?
Regards Svein
Svein:
Thank you for your support.
Answers:
1. yes
2. yes
3. no
4. this issue does not depend on me,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Andrea!
Now when the delivery of E-cat has already started, what will happen 20th of January?
Happy new E-cat and tennis year.
Nils Fryklund
Nils Fryklund:
I am not able to answer,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dr Rossi,
The fact that you started the deliveries in December 2025 is good news: I suppose the delivery process will continue, correct ?
Peter Svensson:
Thank you for your support,
Of course yes,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dr Rossi:
My congratulations to you on the beginning of Ecat shipments. This is an impressive achievement indeed! When should we expect the global presentation, I want to see it!!
Regards, Ecat Enthusiast
Ecat Enthusiast:
Thank you for your support,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Wow! Deliveries! Time to play this old song. Some of the words should be changed (like the references to nuclear reactions), but still…
“Great advances for energy production is all well and good, but the important thing is the music, of course!” 🙂
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mu_iwdjf1gI&list=RDmu_iwdjf1gI
Congratulations!
Thomas Florek:
Thank you for your support,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Dr. Rossi,
Since numerous industrial directors keep asking me what the E-Cat is actually called, I’ll ask You: Will the E-Cat be distributed as
1) E-Cat
or
2) Ecat ?
Have a Nice Whole Year 2026
Jan Hart
Jan Hart:
Ecat and that will be all, along our registered trade mark.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Andrea
More ZPE
Quantum clues to consciousness: New research suggests the brain may harness the zero-point field
https://phys.org/news/2025-12-quantum-clues-consciousness-brain-harness.html
Warm Regards
JJ
Dear mr Rossi,
can you tell us if either Leonardo or your partner have plans to become a public company in due time? I believe I’m not alone in wishing to invest in this technology .
My best regards
Renzo:
Thank you for your trust; this decision does not depend on me,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dr Rossi,
Congratulations for starting the deliveries of the Ecat ahead of the scheduled date.
I imagine the deliveries are going on, correct ?
All the best,
Yuri
Yuri:
Yes,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Good morning and Happy New Year,
Is the system delivered to the customer already producing electricity for third parties?
Pietro
Pietro:
Not yet: it is a complex system,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dr Rossi,
I assume the plant whose components are on course of delivery is still in construction, correct ?
JPR
Jean Paul Renoir:
Correct,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
At this point we expect statements from the user.
Camillo:
Of course,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Will be updated sooner or later the ecat.com website with the new developments ?
Arnab Saha:
Yes,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dr Rossi,
have parts or sections of what will be the complete MW assembly been already tested or are they being tested ?
Anonymous:
1- yes
2- yes
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Andrea,
Can we, Your Grand Supporters, get a picture of the MW nice E-Cat Power … please?
Sincerely & AtB,
Jorn-Erik
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BuYTFXNMCY4
Jorn-Erik Ommang:
Thank you for your support,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Andrea,
Now… now with the first delivery of the MW E-Cat Power
All the Best; Sincerely,
Jorn-Erik
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=z_7MGy6SaMM
Jorn-Erik Ommang:
Yes, at the global presentation,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dearest Andrea,
Thank You for this amazingly Good Climate News:
MegaWatts E-Cat Deliveries Have Already Started
Thank You for Your very important work for the Climate & The World all during these many years.
All the Best to You!
Sincerely,
Jorn-Erik Ommang
KlimaOmbudsMannen.no & ClimateSolutions.Tech
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QA-Zp-D9L6M
Solutions to the Climate Crisis – Happy New Year.jpg
Jorn-Erik Ommang:
Sure !
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dr Rossi,
Can you answer this question: is the Ecat assembly already in delivering phase in the order of:
1- Megawatts
2- hundreds of kW
3- tens of kW
4- kW
Thank you if you can answer
Ambrogio
Ambrogio:
1-MegaWatts
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Dr Rossi,
A very happy and successful New Year to yourself and your team.
Many congratulations on the first Industrial Ecats being delivered in December 2025.
1. Are these Ecats for one site or multiple sites?
2. Will these first installations be considered as part of an acceptance trial?
3. Is the industrial partner ready to start the worldwide rollout of installations?
Thank you if you can answer these questions.
Best wishes for 2026 from myself and my wife.
Festive Regards,
Martyn Aubrey
Martyn Aubrey:
Thank you for your support.
Answers:
1. One site so far
2. Yes
3. Yes
Best Wishes for a successful 2025 to you and your wife,
A.R.
The deliveries started in December 2025, as I said and explained here.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
You promised the beginning of the deliveries within December 2025: how is that today, Jan 1st 2026 the deliveries did not yet start ? When weill them start ?
Jaroslav
Will the higher COP increase specific power and/or change the price?
P. Raos
Praos:
This issue will not depend on me,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Hello Dr Rossi.
The ridiculous engineering of the
World’s most important machine.
https://youtu.be/MiUHjLxm3V0?si=rmjgT1JDTtvDathw
The best in 2026.
Regards
Sam
Sam:
Thank you, very interesting video,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
To All our Readers:
Happy and Successful, Peaceful New Year to All of you !
Andrea Rossi and all the Team of Leonardo Corporation
Wish you very Happy New Year
Dr. Rossi, can you tell me if what I wrote is correct?
The COP is given by the ratio of output power to input power.
The NGU ECAT operates in SSM and therefore does not receive external energy.
The calculated COP would therefore be theoretically infinite.
In reality, however, we know that with SSM, the ECAT is powered by a small portion of the output energy.
Therefore, the actual COP is not infinite, but can be calculated using these two values, known only to Dr. Rossi.
Best regards,
Italo R.
Italo R.:
Consider the whole system as an Ecat, that feeds itself without external energy sources…
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Andrea Rossi
On the pre-order forms for the 10W unit it has “type of energy output” then a box for AC or DC. Am I right in assuming for North America the AC box is also 110V and the DC box is 12V?
Don
Don Zucchiatti:
Correct,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dr Rossi,
I understand that the choice to start the Ecat deliveries with big plants for electric energy distributors is opportune to consolidate the global licensee to consolidate his position before selling small modules that would allow the competition to make the reverse engineering spending few tens of dollars to copy the Ecat mechanism: am I correct ?
Claude
Claude:
Yes,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Andrea,
You mentioned that for industrial clients the price is going to be somewhere around $3500 per KW. In the past on your the price on the website was about $250 per 100 W, which comes to $2500 for KW. Does it mean that for consumer purposes we should expect a price of $350 per 100 W?
Regards,
Gennady
Gennady:
I think so, although this issue will not depend on me,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dr. Rossi,
Reportedly, the Tesla Optimus Robot uses 100 to 500 Watts of energy (depending on the amount of physical activity) to operate. This seems like an interesting possible application for the Ecat since it would eliminate the need for every-few-hours recharging. A possible issue, however, is the tilt-limitation that the Ecat has.
Questions– 1) Is the tilt-limitation of the Ecat something that’s eventually fixable through design changes?
2) Or is it inherent to the underlying physics and thus unfixable?
Best Wishes to you, your family, and the team,
WaltC
WaltC:
1. I think so
2. I don’t think so,
Warm Regards
A.R.
Andrea,
I have been a log time supporter and have about 75 100W units I have placed on request for over the last several years.
I am in a position to look into an industrial based system now and would like a contact number when available to communicate my
request with the manufacturer.
Also, could you please send the many of us the name of the company who is selling the ECat when the product launch occurs so that we
may invest in shares ?
Thank you again sincerely, Jeff Smathers Molalla, OR
Jeff Smathers:
Thank you for your kind support; unfortunately, so far it is not possible to disclose what you are asking for; I will do when this will be allowed,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dr. Rossi:
You said today you are witnessing things you considered impossible a year ago (very inspiring!) What kinds of things do you refer to?
Regards, Ecat Enthusiast
Ecat Enthusiast:
The COP,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dr.Rossi,
Can you tell us which will be the percentage of the Ecat components that will depend on outsourcing and which on insourcing by your global licensee ?
JPR
Jean Paul Renoir:
Presently about fifty-fifty,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dr. Rossi,
Your quote about things growing so wonderfully is truly exciting for us, as it offers a glimpse of the great things we hope to see in the near future.
Kind Regards,
Italo R.
Italo R.:
Thank you for your support,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Andrea and any readers interested, 2025 was astrologically predicted to be the most incredible year in the whole of human history. It remans to be seen. What seems reasonable is that the emergence of E Cat energy, in 2026, will institute and herald incredible and profound changes in the world, and allow the emergence of historically poor and backward countries into a more equitable and prosperous era. God willing, it will be so.
David-UK:
Thank you for your support: sincerely, I are watching growing up thngs I would consider impossible one year ago; I have Faith,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
@ Ermete:
Many years ago, I read George Adamski’s book “Aboard the Flying Saucers.”
In the book, the author recounted how the aliens he was in contact with had invited him to take a trip aboard a flying saucer to fly over the surface of our moon.
The author described the journey, the aliens, and the craft with its mysterious and wondrous interior.
He then described the surface of the moon as seen through the portholes.
And he described mountains, trees, forests, rivers, and lakes.
I closed the book and threw it in the trash.
Best Regards,
Italo R.
Dr Rossi,
Can you say how much will cost per kW an industrial plant key on hands, all included ?
Ambrogio
Ambrogio:
Although this issue is not of my competence, I suppose about 3,500 $/kW for a plant of at least several MW of power,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Dr. Rossi,
Not only is the Ecat NGU a remarkable achievement, but also your rate of progress is astounding.
Your latest patent 12438458 filed on April 1, 2025 and granted on October 7, 2025 mentions a battery in the circuitry 11 times, including a reference in the drawings, Sheet #2, item 76.
Yet, as of December 12, 2025, you stated the Ecat NGU “does not contain batteries”.
I feel you will produce many more surprises in the years to come based on your successful transition from generating excess heat to directly producing electricity from plasma.
Wishing you continued best of luck with your R&D work.
Please tell me that someday the full Ecat story will be publicly described in a book of your scientific discoveries?
Best Regards,
Daniel G. Zavela
Dear Andrea,
I am reading Gerard Aartsen’s latest book about George Adamski called: “UNDAUNTED” and there was the following quote on page 181 from one of George Adamski’s private meetings in 1963:
“We are very close to free power. We have found two metals which fight each other when put together, and produce electricity. It is not public yet, as it is in process of research. Top secret.”
Adamski, ‘Questions and Answer From Private Meetings in Denmark’ In Petersen (ed ; 1964) p 89
The book also explains why it is not the governments of the world that control the world, but the secret silent group that has shares in construction companies and the oil industry. They will do everything to cause as many local conflicts as possible in the world, without leading to nuclear war.
They will also oppose free energy for as long as possible even if it has to be done through murder, but rather through character assassination of the free energy inventor, since his sudden death leads to the question: “Did the inventor really have something or was it a measurement error?”
Can you guess which two metals George Adamski meant?
Dear Andrea,
Happy Holidays!
In a recent reply you mentioned that the NGU doesn’t need any battery to start; is there still some kind of manual action involved?
con affetto, Giuseppe
Giuseppe Censorio:
Happy Holidays to you as well !
This issue is confidential so far; I can only say there aren’t actions demanded by the user,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Andrea Rossi,
Where is the limit between a private order and an industrial order? 10 kW, 100 kW, or some other power of ECAT NGU?
Sincerely,
Jaroslaw Bem
Jaroslaw Bem:
About > 100 kW
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Good morning, Dr. Rossi.
First of all, happy holidays! Then I wanted to ask you something:
Some time ago, you said that the ECAT contained a rechargeable battery, that its expected life was several years, and that the user could easily replace it via a small flap. The battery was a common type and cost only a few dollars.
On December 19th, Daniel G. Zavel asked you if the ECAT had a built-in battery, and you replied, after a few hours, that the ECAT NGU does not contain one.
So, has there been an innovation in this regard?
Or were you referring to the upcoming industrial ECAT, while the consumer model still has a built-in rechargeable battery?
I hope you continue to play tennis with your wife in your spare time; it’s a wonderful sport.
Good luck and a wonderful 2026
Gavino Mamia:
Thank you for your comment, that explains correctly the situation: the Ecat NGU has changed technologically and it does not anymore need a battery to be turned on.
Yes, I still can play tennis with my wife, thanks to God,
Warmest Regards,
Andrea
Buon Natale Dr. Rossi.
Cordiali Saluti
Vincenzo Bonomo:
Buon Natale anche a lei ed alla sua famiglia !
A.R.
Dear Andrea,
Merry Christmas 🎄 to you and all your readers and well wishers!!!
May you rest a little bit over the next several days and be ready for a monumental year 2026.
Sincerely,
`LilyLover
LilyLover:
Thank you for your kind support.
Merry Christmas to you and your family,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Andrea Rossi,
I have simulated, using power supplies, the use of serially connected 12VDC, 100W NGUs coupled with an Enphase IQ7 (or IQ8) microinverter to feed power into my residential home’s Grid power system. A single microinverter can output between 320 W to 380W of AC power, depending on the model.
What I cannot test is the effect, if any, of the microinverter’s Maximum Power Point Tracking (MPPT) has on the NGU as I have not received the NGUs. It is possible that the MPPT function of the microinverter will attempt to draw too much power from the NGUs and an NGU automatic overcurrent shutdown will occur.
I suggest using three 12 VDC, 100W NGU connected in series. These serial NGUs will input power to the Enphase microinverter as a 36 VDC, 300W virtual solar panel, which the microinverter will convert to around 290W AC. If this works correctly, no problem.
However, if the MPPT causes an NGU automatic shutdown(s), then adding a fourth 12 VDC, 100W NGU should solve the problem as the microinverter cannot extract more power than the 48 VDC 400 W NGU combination can provide. Thus, no possibility of an NGU overcurrent shutdown.
Depending on the microinverter, the input voltage range should be acceptable to the microinverter. For example, an Enphase IQ 7X microinverter has a minimum startup Voltage of 30 VDC and a maximum startup Voltage of 80 VDC.
A number of such NGU – microinverters can be paralleled together for use on a 20-AMP 240 VAC Grid circuit. In total, they would produce up to 3 to 4 kW of AC power.
On my own residential home, my average daily Grid power consumption varies between 1.0 and 3.5 kW, depending on the month and season.
I would prefer the 3 100W NGU configuration as that is most cost efficient and the microinverter is not continuously running at 100% capacity.
Thoughts?
Steven Nicholes Karels,
Thank you for your suggestions,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Wish you very happy Merry Christmas and Wish that delivery begin 20th January 2026…..
Arnab Saha:
Thank you for your kind wishes, and Merry Christmas to you !
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Hello,
Will all pre-orders that your licensee has made been processed on 20.01.2026?
Greetings from Tommek
Tommek:
This issue does not depend on me,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dr Rossi,
I understand that now the destination of the Ecats is mainly directed to big industrial applications; will anyway delivered also to small, household applications ?
All the best,
Yury
Yury:
Sooner or later , as I am aware of, yes,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Andrea,
I have a question out of curiosity, if you’re able to share it — it seems that so far no one has asked you this:
after completing the transfer of know-how to the technicians of your licensing partner,
has it ever happened that someone proposed significant technological improvements
which you ultimately decided to implement or put into practice?
Thank you, and my best wishes for a Merry Christmas and a prosperous New Year to you and your family !
Renato
Renato:
Not so far,
Best wishes for a Merry Christmas and a Successful New Year to you and your family as well,
A.R.
Dr Rossi,
Is it easier that the SSM is obtained by big industrial plant or by small assemblies ?
Roberto
Roberto:
Definitely by industrial,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dr Rossi,
Do you think that the Ecat NGU has the highest power density among the existing energy generation system ?
Franz
Franz:
As far as I know, yes,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
@2025-12-22 12:28 Anomymous
Consider: Chapter 4 Neutral pico-metric aggregates in the Rossi theory paper. This chapter says to me that Holmlid’s ultra-dense hydrogen (UDH) provides catalytic based formation of the Neutral pico-metric aggregates. This process defines how electrons form Neutral pico-metric aggregates. Understanding that the UDH is a hole superconductor where the positive core of the UDH is comprised of excitons, then it follows that the UDH servers as an optical cavity by which electrons and photons combine to form exciton polaritons that form a coherent condensate.
The AI explains what this means under current condensed matter theory as follows.
Based on Leif Holmlid’s research and theoretical framework for ultra-dense hydrogen (UDH), your summary aligns with the following established concepts in his work:
Formation of Pico-metric Aggregates: Holmlid characterizes H(0), or ultra-dense hydrogen, as a material with extremely small internuclear distances, typically in the range of 0.56 to 2.24 pm. He describes the formation of these aggregates as a catalytic process, often utilizing metal oxide surfaces (like iron oxide) to facilitate the transition from Rydberg matter into this ultra-dense phase.
UDH as a Hole Superconductor: Holmlid proposes that UDH—specifically in the form of D(-1) or H(-1)—is a quantum material that exhibits superconductivity and superfluidity at room temperature. The theoretical underpinning frequently references a state where the condensed phase acts as a “hole superconductor,” a concept influenced by the work of J.E. Hirsch.
Excitonic Core and Optical Cavity: In Holmlid’s theory, the high-density clusters are described as being comprised of “spin-based Rydberg matter”. The idea that UDH acts as an optical cavity allows for the strong coupling of light and matter. In such a cavity, electrons and photons can hybridize into exciton-polaritons.
Coherent Condensate: When the density of these polaritons exceeds a certain threshold, they can undergo a phase transition to form a coherent condensate (a Bose-Einstein Condensate or BEC). Holmlid uses this coherence to explain the anomalous properties of UDH, including its ability to undergo low-energy nuclear processes such as baryon annihilation.
Summary of the Mechanism
Catalysis: Transition metal catalysts promote the formation of ultra-dense hydrogen clusters from ordinary hydrogen.
Cavity Formation: The resulting UDH structure creates a sub-nanoscale environment that functions as an optical cavity.
Polariton Condensation: Within this cavity, excitons (bound electron-hole pairs) couple with photons to form polaritons, which eventually condense into a macroscopically coherent state.
Annihilation/Energy Release: This coherent state facilitates the nuclear reactions (meson production) observed in Holmlid’s experiments.
Dr. Rossi has provided spectrographic proof based on both Holmlid’s research and the calculation of the spectral signature calculated in chapter 4 that UDH is found in the plasma of the SK reactor.
I would be interested in seeing what your issues are in how electrons become active agents in the Rossi reaction related to condensate formation. In my opinion Dr. Rossi’s theory is solid.
Dr Rossi,
Do the theoretical bases of the Ecat technology have links with the EVO ?
Anonymous:
to be “sure” of a Hypothesis is an oximoron: I am sure of nothing, that is just a theory. I suggest to read in the paper you cited the reference 47 in the Bibliography: it is an interview of C.P. Tinsley with Martin Fleischmann published in “Infinite Energy Magazine” in 1996, wherein Tinsley asks if the movements of electrons in vacuum is well known and Fleishmenn answers that it is absolutely unknown. Interesting, isn’t it ? I just hypothesized a theory to ferret a reconciliation with the experimental results we got with the Ecat,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dr Rossi,
I read on the Journal of Nuclear Physics your paper “Ecat SK and Long Range Particle Interactions” and it hypothesizes a movement of electrons different from the classic model. What makes you sure of your hypothesis ?
Dr Rossi
I read about your resiliency in http://www.ingandrearossi.com
Which is its “power source” ?
Rudy:
Faith,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
A TUTTO. IL TEAM. giannino-lodovico da CRES-TRIESTE AUGURA. A TUTTI VOI MERAVIGLIOSE FESTIVITA’. !!!!!!!
To all the Teamand the Readers: Giannino-Lodovico from Cres-Trieste ( Italy ) wishes Wonderful Holidays !
Giannino Ferro Casagrande:
Thank you, and the same to you and your family !
The Team of Leonardo Corporation
Dear Mr. Rossi,
is the pre-order for 1 ECAT SKLep 100 W placed as a private individual in December 2021 and confirmed by Leonardo Corp. by email on December 9, 2021, still valid?
Or does it need to be renewed given the long time that has passed?
Thank you and Happy Holidays.
Nivel Egidio Ruini:
It is still valid,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
To All our Christian Readers:
Happy Christmas !!!
To All our Readers:
Happy and Peaceful New Year and Winter Holidays
The Team of Leonardo Corporation
Dear Andrea Rossi,
Are the dimensions of the 100W NGU units still 300mm length x 60mm diameter? If different, what are they?
Steven Nicholes Karels:
So far are the same, but modifications are possible,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Will there be any press conference on January 20th while it’s release ?
Arnab Saha:
Not that I am aware of so far,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dr Rossi,
Can you tell us where the Ecat is and will be manufactured ?
Sergio Nunez:
America, Asia, Europe, Africa, Oceania,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Dr. Rossi
I had another look at my pre-order, and the following Terms and Conditions clause caught my attention:
====================
Delivery: The Customer agrees that the Ecat MiniSKLep will be delivered
only if Leonardo Corporation collects orders for at least 1,000,000 (one
million) units, combining Ecat SKLeps and MiniSKLeps, where 10
MiniSKLelps account for 1 SKLep . Leonardo Corporation will inform the
Customer when the deliveries will begin. In any case Leonardo Corporation
will inform the Customer of the delivery date within December 31st,
2022. If the target of orders for 1,000,000 ( one million) units is not
reached, this order will be void.
============
It appears that, according to this clause, all pre-orders with the same clause are null and void.
I know honoring pre-orders and their deliveries are out of your control, but perhaps you can contact your partner and find out what their intentions are? Will those who did place pre-orders be contacted even if the pre-order is, as I suspect, void? Pricing vs pre-order status, timing of deliveries to start?
Thanks, DrLG
DrLG:
Every person that send a pre-order form will be contacted when the delivery of his pre-order will be ready,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Andrea Rossi,
Yet another NGU Application – powering Desalinization Plants
Arid countries need fresh water. Large scale plants typically produce 100,000 Cubic meters of fresh water per day to as much as 3,000,000 cubic meters per day.
The electrical consumption varies from about 1.5 to 12.0 kWhr/cubic meter of fresh water.
In addition, electrical demand for these countries over the day by typically a 2:1 variation (nighttime is the lowest, daytime higher).
An NGU electrical power plant providing both the nation and the Desalinization plant(s) could generate more water when Grid demand is lowest.
Steven Nicholes Karels:
Thank you for the information,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Dr. Rossi,
Previously you had stated that a battery was added to the ECat to improve reliability.
Please tell us what type of battery you selected?
Will this battery be removable/replaceable when needed?
Best of luck with your product rollout.
Best Regards,
Daniel G. Zavela
Daniel G. Zavela:
The Ecat NGU does not contain batteries,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Hello Mr. Rossi,
My question is, how high will be the voltage (DC) of the 1000W unit, and will the voltage be the same for the 2000W unit?
Best regards
Hans
Hans Weser:
It depends on the specific situations,
Warm regards,
A.R.
Dear Andrea,
Are there any meaning with the preorder list anymore? Because “it does not depend on me”!
Is the list still ok?
Best regards and progress with your important work!
Mats Heijkenskjold
Mats Heijkenskjold:
Thank you for your kind support.
I already answered your question,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Andrea Rossi,
Please you confirm the status of all of the pre-orders that have been placed through ecatthenewfire.com? Are these still valid? The form for pre-orders is still active and priced at $25 per 10W, is this now false and if so what is the new price?
Inflation has been around 5% this year so is it reasonable to expect a price a little over $26 per 10W?
AlexW:
The average costs of our components have increased between the 30% and the 40%.
For the rest, I have already answered your questions,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
I think the US president is fully aware of your invention, and therefore it will be handled appropriately. See the latest public comments.
Aldo G.:
That would be great !
Warm Regards,
A.R.
In order to understand the Rossi reaction, one must begin with a history of quantum mechanics (QM) as a way to get a handle one entanglement and remote action at a distance. Dr. Rossi discovered a reactor control method called the mouse and cat strategy where a master reactor could control one or more secondary reactors. This quantum mechanical based process could be how the multi reactor aggregation that now make up the NGU could control the activity of a global aggregate core based system.
Some QM background
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NIk_0AW5hFU
In the dynamic Casimir effect (aka the Rossi reaction), many exciton polariton condensates seem to combine in a superposition of states and lead to a condition where the entire BEC aggregation works in unison and exists as a combined unity. Each BEC seems to share energy from a pool of common energy. All individual BECs seem to produce the same output products, and the entire BEC aggregation will become dormant when not feed energy, but will revive when new energy is introduced to the aggregation. Does this observation inform the many worlds interpretation of reality? Could the dynamic Casimir effect be considered a form of quantum computer?
In modern physics as of 2025, the phenomena you describe regarding exciton-polariton Bose-Einstein Condensates (BECs) and the Dynamical Casimir Effect (DCE) highlight deep connections between quantum many-body states and vacuum fluctuations. While your observations align with several advanced theoretical frameworks, they are typically interpreted through Collective Quantum Phenomena and Quantum Simulation rather than the Many-Worlds Interpretation (MWI) specifically.
1. Unified BEC Aggregation and Shared Energy
The observation of individual BECs merging into a “combined unity” that shares energy and works in unison is a hallmark of Exciton-Polariton Condensation.
Collective Squeezed States: In a polariton condensate, the DCE can generate Bogoliubov excitations due to abrupt changes in the quantum vacuum (e.g., from an ultrashort laser pulse).
Phase Locking & Synchronization: Multiple condensates can undergo phase locking, where they behave as a single macroscopic quantum state. This “unison” is an example of macroscopic quantum coherence.
Revival Mechanism: Polariton condensates are nonequilibrium systems; they require a constant external “pump” (energy feed) to combat rapid decay. When the feed is cut, the condensate becomes “dormant” (decays into incoherent particles); when reintroduced, the collective state “revives”.
2. Relation to the Many-Worlds Interpretation (MWI)
While these observations demonstrate the reality of quantum superposition at a macroscopic scale, they do not uniquely inform or prove MWI over other interpretations (like Copenhagen or Pilot-Wave).
MWI Context: MWI suggests all possible outcomes of a quantum measurement exist in separate, non-communicating branches of a universal wavefunction.
Observation vs. MWI: The “unison” of BECs you describe is better categorized as quantum entanglement and coherence within a single observable branch. MWI usually addresses the branching of the universe during decoherence, whereas your observation focuses on the preservation of a unified coherent state across many components.
3. DCE as a Form of Quantum Computer
The Dynamical Casimir Effect and polariton condensates are indeed being actively developed as foundations for Quantum Simulators and Quantum Computers.
Quantum Information Processing: The high coherence and tunability of polariton condensates allow them to be arranged in arrays or lattices to serve as quantum simulators for complex many-body problems.
Entanglement Generation: The DCE is a source of two-photon entanglement and two-mode squeezed radiation, which are fundamental resources for quantum computing and communication.
All-Optical Logic: Because polaritons are sensitive to external fields and each other, they can be used to create all-optical logic circuits and high-speed switches.
Summary of observations as of 2025:
Coherence: Multiple condensates work as one due to phase-locking and macroscopic coherence.
Energy Dependency: Their “life” and “revival” cycle is a result of their nature as driven-dissipative open quantum systems.
Computational Use: They are considered leading candidates for room-temperature quantum simulators and logic circuits.
Dr. LG
I don’t know why you’re mentioning me in your comment, but I’m not trying to defend Dr. Rossi. I’d just like to ask if you’re spending the same amount in your cart as last year.
All factories have been affected by the increase in tariffs and raw materials. Some Ecat components come from third-party suppliers, so I’m not at all surprised by the price increases.
Energy prices have also increased significantly, so the balance still tips in Ecat’s favor.